463
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

How do national specialty groups develop undergraduate guidelines for medical schools, and which are successful? A systematic review

, &

References

  • [AAMC] Association of American Medical Colleges. 2008. Contemporary issues in medicine: oral health education for medical and dental students. Medical school objectives project. Washington (DC): AAMC.
  • [AAMC/JAHF] Association of American Medical Colleges/John A. Hartford Foundation Inc. 2009. Minimum geriatric competencies for medical students. Acad Med. 84:604–610.
  • Anderson MB. 2004. A thematic summary of the geriatrics curricula at 40 US Medical schools. Acad Med. 79:S213–S222.
  • [APA], Novack, AH for the Education Committee of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association. 1985. Educational guidelines for training in general/ambulatory pediatrics. Virginia (USA): Ambulatory Pediatric Association.
  • [APA-COMSEP] American Pediatrics Association, Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics. 2005. COMSEP curriculum revision 2005. 3rd ed. USA: APA/COMSEP.
  • Atkinson HH, Zaldy ST, Brennan M, Granville L. 2014. A collaborative national model to assess competencies for medical students, residents, and other healthcare practitioners in gait and falls risk evaluation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 62:1155–1160.
  • Bernstein J, Garcia GH, Guevara JL, Mitchell GW. 2011. Progress report: the prevalence of required medical school instruction in musculoskeletal medicine at decade’s end. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469:895–897.
  • Blundell A, Gordon A, Gladman J, Masud T. 2009. Undergraduate teaching in geriatric medicine: the role of national curricula. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 30:75–88.
  • Brodkey AC, Sierles FS, Woodward JL. 2006. Use of clerkship learning objectives by members of the Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry. Acad Psych. 30:150–157.
  • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2009 Systemic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. 3rd ed. UK: University of York.
  • [CDIM/SGIM] Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine/Society of General Internal Medicine. 2006. Core medicine clerkship curriculum guide. A resource for teachers and learners. Version 3.0. USA: CDIM/SGIM.
  • Douglass AB, Gonsalves W, Maier R, Silk H, Stevens N, Tysinger J, Wrightson AS. 2007. Smile for life: a national oral health curriculum for family medicine. A model for curriculum development by STFM groups. Fam Med. 39:88–90.
  • Erickson SS, Metheny WP, Cox SM, Bienstock JL, Espey EL, Goepfert AR, Hammoud MM, Hartmann DM, Katz N, Krueger PM, et al. 2008. A comprehensive review to establish priority learning objectives for medical students in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol.199:563.e1–563.e9.
  • Ferullo A, Silk H, Savageau JA. 2011. Teaching oral health in US medical schools: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 86:226–230.
  • [GMC] General Medical Council. 2009. Tomorrow’s doctors. London (UK): General Medical Council.
  • Gordon AL, Blundell A, Dhesi JK, Forrester-Paton C, Forrester-Paton J, Mitchell HK, Bracewell N, Mjojo J, Masud T, Gladman JR. 2014. UK medical teaching about ageing is improving but there is still work to be done: the second national survey of undergraduate teaching in ageing and geriatric medicine. Age Age. 43:293–297.
  • Gordon AL, Blundell AG, Gladman JR, Masud T. 2010. Are we teaching our students what they need to know about ageing? Results from the UK National Survey of Undergraduate Teaching in Ageing and Geriatric Medicine. Age Age. 29:385–388.
  • Goroll AH, Morrison G, Bass EB, Jablonover R, Blackman D, Platt R, Whelan A, Hekelman FP. 2001. Reforming the core clerkship in internal medicine: the SGIM/CDIM Project. Society of General Internal Medicine/Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 134:30–37.
  • Haig A, Dozier M. 2003a. BEME Guide No. 3: systematic searching for evidence in medical education – part 1: sources of information. Med Teach. 25:352–363.
  • Haig A, Dozier M. 2003b. BEME Guide No. 3: systematic searching for evidence in medical education – part 2: constructing searches. Med Teach. 25:463–484.
  • Hammick M, Dornan T, Steinert Y. 2010. Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: from idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. 13. Med Teach. 32:3–15.
  • Hammoud MM, Cox SM, Goff B, Goepfert A, Butler A, Swanson DB, Holtzman KZ, Allbee K, Katz NT, Erickson SS. 2005. The essential elements of undergraduate medical education in obstetrics and gynecology: a comparison of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Medical Student Educational Objectives and the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination. Am J Obs Gyn. 193:1773–1779.
  • Harden RM. 1986. ASME Medical Education Booklet No. 20: ten questions to ask when planning a course or curriculum. Med Educ. 20:356–365.
  • Jablonover RS, Blackmann DJ, Bass EB. 2000. Evaluation of a national curriculum reform effort for the medicine core clerkship. J Gen Intern Med. 15:484–491.
  • Kern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. 1998. Curriculum development for medical education: a six step approach. Baltimore (USA): John Hopkins University Press.
  • Kuo AA, Slavin SJ. 1999. Clerkship curricular revision based on the ambulatory pediatric association and the council on medical student education in pediatrics guidelines: does it make a difference? Pediatrics. 103:898–901.
  • Manthey DE, Ander DS, Gordon DC, Morrissey T, Sherman SC, Smith MD, Rimple D, Thibodeau LG, and the Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM) Curriculum Revision Group. 2010. Emergency medicine clerkship curriculum: an update and revision. Acad Emerg Med. 17:638–643.
  • Masud T, Blundell A, Gordon AL, Mulpeter K, Roller R, Singler K, Goeldlin A, Stuck A. 2014. European undergraduate curriculum in geriatric medicine developed using an international modified Delphi technique. Age Age. 43:695–702.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, and the PRISMA group. 2009. Research methods and reporting: preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 339:332–336.
  • Noble J, Somal K, Gill HS, Lam W-C. 2009. An analysis of undergraduate ophthalmology training in Canada. Can J Ophthalmol. 44:513–518.
  • Olson AL, Woodhead J, Berkow R, Kaufmann NM, Marshall SG. 2000. A national general clerkship curriculum: the process of development and implementation. Pediatrics. 106:216–222.
  • Pfenninger EG, Domres BD, Stahl W, Bauer A, Houser CM, Himmelseher S. 2010. Medical student disaster medicine education: the development of an educational resource. Int J Emerg Med. 3:9–20.
  • Prystowsky M, Borowitz M, Conran R, Purcell J, Norman J. 2014. Pathology competencies for medical education. USA: Academic Pathology; [accessed 2015 Aug 15]. http://apcprods.org/UME/Competencies/C3%20Diagnostic%20Medicine.pdf.
  • Singler K, Sieber CC, Biber R, Roller RE. 2012. Considerations for the development of an undergraduate curriculum in geriatric medicine. Gerontology. 59:385–391.
  • [STFM] Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. 2015. Smiles for life: a national oral health curriculum [Internet]. USA: Society of Teachers of Family Medicine; [accessed 2015 Aug 15]. http://www.smilesforlifeoralhealth.org/buildcontent.aspx?pagekey =62947&lastpagekey =97821&userkey =11797668&sessionkey =2498538&tut =555&customerkey =84&custsitegroupkey =0.
  • Tandeter H, Carelli F, Timonen M, Javashvili G, Basak O, Wilm S, Zarbailov N, Spiegel W, Brekke M. 2011. A ‘minimal core curriculum’ for Family Medicine in undergraduate medical education: a European Delphi survey among EURACT representatives. Eur J Gen Pract. 17:217–220.
  • [UEMS] European Union of Medical Specialists. 2003. Medical undergraduate training in geriatric medicine in the European Union [Internet]. Brussels (Belgium): European Union of Medical Specialists; [accessed 2015 Aug 14]. http://uemsgeriatricmedicine.org/UEMS1/dok/undergraduate_training_-_final_document_from_2003.pdf.
  • Woolf AD, Walsh NE, Akesson K. 2004. Global core recommendations for a musculoskeletal undergraduate curriculum. Ann Rheum Dis. 63:517–524.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.