Community governance during the Shanghai COVID-19 lockdown I: the roles and actions of residents’ committees

References

• Arnold, G. (2015). Street-level policy entrepreneurship. Public Management Review, 17(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, D. (2006). Building ‘community’: New strategies of governance in urban China. Economy and Society, 35(4), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140600960799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, R., & He, S. (2022). Governing homeowner associations in China’s gated communities: The extension of state infrastructural power and its uneven reach. Urban Geography, 43(4), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1878429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Lu, C., & Yang, Y. (2007). Popular support for grassroots self-government in urban China: Findings from a Beijing survey. Modern China, 33(4), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700407303966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. S. (2006). Urban Chinese homeowners as citizen-consumers. In S. Garon, & P. L. Maclachlan (Eds.), The ambivalent consumer : Questioning consumption in East Asia and the West (pp. 281–299). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch Aviram, N., Cohen, N., & Beeri, I. (2018). Low-level bureaucrats, local government regimes and policy entrepreneurship. Policy Sciences, 51(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9296-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2020). Social workers and the policy process: When does opportunity knock? Journal of Policy Practice and Research, 1(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-020-00002-1
   Google Scholar
• Gassner, D., & Gofen, A. (2018). Street-level management: A clientele-agent perspective on implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., Zhang, Y., & Yi, Z. (2023). Towards resilient neighbourhood governance: Social tensions in Shanghai’s gated communities before and during the pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(568), https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02085-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He, S. (2015). Homeowner associations and neighborhood governance in Guangzhou, China. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 56(3), 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2015.1095108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberer, T. (2009). Evolvement of citizenship in urban China or authoritarian communitarianism? Neighborhood development, community participation, and autonomy. The Journal of Contemporary China, 18(61), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560903033786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberer, T., & Göbel, C. (2011). The politics of community building in urban China. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heilmann, S. (2016). China’s political system. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. (2005). The public policy process (4th editio). Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. (2006). Collectivism, political control, and gating in Chinese cities. Urban Geography, 27(6), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.27.6.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Wang, X. (2022, November 30). Analysis: The controversial role of residential committees in China’s COVID enforcement. Retrieved Jan 31 from https://www.caixinglobal.com/2022-11-30/analysis-the-controversial-role-of-residential-committees-in-chinas-covid-enforcement-101972722.html
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-Level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration (London), 85(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., Hill, M., & Buffat, A. (2015). Introduction: Defining and understanding street-level bureaucracy. In Buffat Aurélien, Hill Michael, & Hupe Peter L. (Eds.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 3–24). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, K., & Dehaan, L. (2023). The Charleston approach: Placing policy analysis with street level bureaucrats. Urban Geography, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2162270
   Google Scholar
• King, P. J., & Roberts, N. C. (1992). An investigation into the personality profile of policy entrepreneurs. Public Productivity & Management Review, 173–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380990
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W., & Stano, E. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Vol. 45). Little, Brown Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Lavee, E., & Cohen, N. (2019). How street-level bureaucrats become policy entrepreneurs: The case of urban renewal. Governance, 32(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.-M. (2003). Housing tenure and residential mobility in urban China. Urban Affairs Review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 38(4), 510–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087402250360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.-M., & Yi, Z. (2007). The road to homeownership under market transition. Urban Affairs Review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 42(3), 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087406292523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy:The dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Lin, S., Lu, T., Shen, Y., & Liang, S. (2022). Towards a constructed order of co-governance: Understanding the state–society dynamics of neighbourhood collaborative responses to COVID-19 in urban China. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 60(9), 1730–1749. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221081314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, T., Zhang, F., & Wu, F. (2020). The variegated role of the state in different gated neighbourhoods in China. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 57(8), 1642–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019838423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X., Xu, H., & Wang, W. (2021). Clients’ help deservingness, crowd situational stress and discretionary decision-making: An experimental study of regulatory street-level bureaucrats in China. International Public Management Journal, 24(2), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1661892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelstaedt, J. C. (2022). The grid management system in contemporary China: Grass-roots governance in social surveillance and service provision. China Information, 36(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X211011565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, B.-H. (1988). Grassroots organizing in China: The residents’ committee as a linking mechanism between the bureaucracy and the community. Community Development Journal, 23(3), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/23.3.164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U., & Hermans, K. (2018). Meeting (or not) at the street level? A literature review on street-level research in public management, social policy and social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(3), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proudfoot, J., & McCann, E. J. (2008). At street level: Bureaucratic practice in the management of urban neighborhood change. Urban Geography, 29(4), 348–370. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.29.4.348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, X., & Owen, C. (2022). The CCP, campaign governance and COVID-19: Evidence from Shanghai. Chinese Journal of Political Science, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-022-09838-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Read, B. L. (2003). Democratizing the neighbourhood? New private housing and home-owner self-organization in urban China. The China Journal (Canberra, A.C.T.), 49(49), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/3182194
   Google Scholar
• Read, B. L. (2012). Roots of the state : Neighborhood organization and social networks in Beijing and Taipei. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. (2005). How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. S. (1999). Powers of freedom : Reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shieh, L., & Friedmann, J. (2008). Restructuring urban governance: Community construction in contemporary China. City (London, England), 12(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802176433
   Google Scholar
• Skolnick, J. H., & Fyfe, J. J. (1993). Above the law: Police and the excessive use of force. Free Press New York.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, B. (2020). Grid governance in China’s urban middle-class neighbourhoods. The China Quarterly (London), 241, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741019000821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomba, L. (2014). The government next door : Neighborhood politics in urban China. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, X. (2016). Governmentalities in everyday practices: The dynamic of urban neighbourhood governance in China. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 53(11), 2330–2346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015589884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F. (2014). Determinants of the effectiveness of Chinese homeowner associations in solving neighborhood issues. Urban Affairs Review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 50(3), 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413501641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F. (2001). China’s recent urban development in the process of land and housing marketisation and economic globalisation. Habitat International, 25(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(00)00034-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F. (2002). China’s changing urban governance in the transition towards a more market-oriented economy. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 39(7), 1071–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220135491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F. (2018). Housing privatization and the return of the state: Changing governance in China. Urban Geography, 39(8), 1177–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1440126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., & Zhang, F. (2022). Rethinking China’s urban governance: The role of the state in neighbourhoods, cities and regions. Progress in Human Geography, 46(3), 775–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211062171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Yan, H., & Jiang, Y. (2018). How are New community governance structures formed in urban China? Asian Survey, 58(5), 942–965. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.5.942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F. (2008). Gated Communities and Migrant Enclaves: The conundrum for building ‘harmonious community/shequ’. The Journal of Contemporary China, 17(57), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560802253303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, N. M. (2012). Walled without gates: Gated communities in Shanghai. Urban Geography, 33(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.2.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, N. M. (2019). Housing activism in urban China: The quest for autonomy in neighbourhood governance. Housing Studies, 34(10), 1635–1653. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1580679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacka, B. (2017). When the state meets the street: Public service and moral agency. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zang, X. (2017). How cohesive is the Chinese bureaucracy? A case study of street-level bureaucrats in China. Public Administration and Development, 37(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, X. (2020). Research on street-level bureaucracy in China: Past, present, and future. In X. Zang, & H. S. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of public policy and public administration in China (pp. 378–391). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Zhao, J., & Dong, W. (2021). Street-level bureaucrats as policy entrepreneurs: Action strategies for flexible community governance in China. Public Administration (London), 99(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, N., Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). Co-production” as an alternative in post-political China? Conceptualizing the legitimate power over participation in neighborhood regeneration practices. Cities, 141, 104462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T., & Wu, Z. (2020). Citizen–state collaboration in combating COVID-19 in China: Experiences and lessons from the perspective of co-production. American Review of Public Administration, 50(6-7), 777–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020942455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., Chan, R. C. K., & Zhang, X. (2023). District government as a policy entrepreneur: Understanding policy experimentation in China’s Wujin District. Journal of Urban Affairs, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2208757
   Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., & Zhao, W. (2021). Neighbourhood governance during the COVID-19 lockdown in Hangzhou: Coproduction based on digital technologies. Public Management Review, 24(12), 1914–1932. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1945666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar