The Collaborative Service Design Playbook to plan, design, and implement sustainable health services for impact

References

• Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. (2017). National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions, Australian Government. AHMAC.
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.2307/258555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, M. Y., Sweeny, K., Lauer, J. A., Chisholm, D., Sheehan, P., Rasmussen, B., Upreti, S. R., Dixit, L. P., George, K., & Deane, S. (2018). Investing in non-communicable diseases: An estimation of the return on investment for prevention and treatment services. Lancet, 391(10134), 2071–2078. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30665-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomkvist, J., Holmlid, S., & Segelström, F. (2010). Service design research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92, 141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristancho, S., Lingard, L., & Regehr, G. (2017). From problem solving to problem definition: Scrutinizing the complex nature of clinical practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6(1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0314-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P., Rundle-Thiele, S., Pang, B., Knox, K., Parkinson, J., & Hussenoeder, F. (2019). Engaging the dog owner community in the design of an effective koala aversion program. Social Marketing Quarterly, 25(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500418821583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaforce, A., Li, J., Grujovski, M., Parkinson, J., Richards, P., Fahy, M., Good, N., & Jayasena, R. (2023). Creating an implementation enhancement plan for a digital patient fall prevention platform using the CFIR-ERIC approach: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 3794. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053794
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietrich, T., Trischler, J., Schuster, L., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2017). Co-designing services with vulnerable consumers. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(3), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-02-2016-0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durl, J., Trischler, J., & Dietrich, T. (2017). Co-designing with young consumers–reflections, challenges and benefits. Young Consumers, 18(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-08-2017-00725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fynn, J. F., Hardeman, W., Milton, K., & Jones, A. P. (2020). A scoping review of evaluation frameworks and their applicability to real-world physical activity and dietary change programme evaluation. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09062-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, A. (2022). Commentary: Choosing a health behaviour theory or model for related research projects: A narrative review. Journal of Research in Nursing, 27(5), 447–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871211055253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A., Shoesmith, A., Doherty, E., McEvoy, B., Mettert, K., Lewis, C. C., Wolfenden, L., Yoong, S., Kingsland, M., Shelton, R. C., Wiltsey Stirman, S., Imad, N., Sutherland, R., & Nathan, N. (2022). Evaluation of measures of sustainability and sustainability determinants for use in community, public health, and clinical settings: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 17(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01252-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, E., Dietrich, T., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2021). Integrating theory in co-design: An abductive approach. Australasian Marketing Journal, 29(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1839334921998541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, R. E., Crosson, J. C., O’Malley, A. S., Cromp, D., & Taylor, E. F. (2017). Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: A rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implementation Science, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Lynham, S. A. (2007). Criteria for assessing good theory in human resource development and other applied disciplines from an interpretive perspective. Online Submission.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, J., Neumann, A., Sheppard, K., Gilis-Januszewska, A., Greaves, C., Handke, U., Pajunen, P., Puhl, S., Pölönen, A., Rissanen, A., Roden, M., Stemper, T., Telle-Hjellset, V., Tuomilehto, J., Velickiene, D., Schwarz, P., Acosta, T., Adler, M., AlKerwi, A., … Yilmaz, T. (2010). Take action to prevent diabetes–the IMAGE toolkit for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in Europe. Hormone and Metabolic Research, 42(S 01), S37–S55. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1240975
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, X., Robinson, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2020). A micro model of problem definition and policy choice: Issue image, issue association, and policy support of power plants. Policy Studies Journal, 48(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, N. R., & Suggs, L. S. (2013). Theory and model use in social marketing health interventions. Journal of Health Communication, 18(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.688243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludden, G. D., Van Rompay, T. J., Kelders, S. M., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2015). How to increase reach and adherence of web-based interventions: A design research viewpoint. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(7), e4201. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikam, S., & Russell-Bennett, R. (2016). The social marketing theory-based (SMT) approach for designing interventions. Journal of Social Marketing, 6(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-10-2014-0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milat, A. J., Bauman, A., & Redman, S. (2015). Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions. Implementation Science, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0301-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moullin, J. C., Dickson, K. S., Stadnick, N. A., Albers, B., Nilsen, P., Broder-Fingert, S., Mukasa, B., & Aarons, G. A. (2020). Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice. Implementation Science Communications, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00023-7
   Google Scholar
• Mummah, S. A., Robinson, T. N., King, A. C., Gardner, C. D., & Sutton, S. (2016). IDEAS (Integrate, Design, Assess, and Share): A framework and toolkit of strategies for the development of more effective digital interventions to change health behavior. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(12), e5927. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, R., Bertram, M. Y., Jan, S., Niessen, L. W., Sassi, F., Jamison, D. T., Pier, E. G., & Beaglehole, R. (2018). Investing in non-communicable disease prevention and management to advance the sustainable development goals. Lancet, 391(10134), 2029–2035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30667-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., Hannan, T., McDonald, N., Moriarty, S., Nguyen, M., & Ball, L. (2022). Using a Collective Impact framework to evaluate an Australian health alliance for improving health outcomes. Health Promotion International, 37(6), daac148. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., McDonald, N., Seib, C., Moriarty, S., & Anderson, D. (2022). A multi-component evaluation framework of a state-wide preventive health program: My health for life. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 33(S1), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parkinson, J., Schuster, L., Mulcahy, R., & Taiminen, H. M. (2017). Online support for vulnerable consumers: A safe place? Journal of Services Marketing, 31(4/5), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-05-2016-0197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: An emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 36(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland Health. (2016). My Health, Queensland’s Future: Advancing Health 2026. https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/441655/vision-strat-healthy-qld.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, M. J., Dollar, K. M., Miller, C. J., Smith, J. L., Oliver, K. A., Kim, B., … Kirchner, J. E. (2020). Using implementation facilitation to improve healthcare (Version 3). Veterans Health Administration, Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI). 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rundle-Thiele, S., Dietrich, T., & Carins, J. (2021). CBE: A framework to guide the application of marketing to behavior change. Social Marketing Quarterly, 27(3), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004211021643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadana, R., & Blas, E. (2013). What can public health programs do to improve health equity? Public Health Reports, 128(6_suppl3), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549131286S303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R. (2008b). Modeling Health Behavior Change: How to Predict and Modify the Adoption and Maintenance of Health Behaviors. Applied Psychology, 57(1), 1–29. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R. (2008a). Some burning issues in research on health behavior change. Applied Psychology, 57(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secomandi, F., & Snelders, D. (2013). Interface design in services: A post phenomenological approach. Design Issues, 29(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seib, C., Moriarty, S., McDonald, N., Anderson, D., & Parkinson, J. (2022). Changes in health behaviours in adults at-risk of chronic disease: Primary outcomes from the My health for life program. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1648. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14056-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., & Bragge, P. (2020). Research co-design in health: A rapid overview of reviews. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., Arendsen, J., Cremers, A., De Jong, A., De Jong, J., & De Koning, N. (2013). Using interactive model simulations in co-design: An experiment in urban design. CoDesign, 9(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.755549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of co-design in service design projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, J., Dietrich, T., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2019). Co-design: From expert-to user-driven ideas in public service design. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1595–1619. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, J., Pervan, S. J., Kelly, S. J., & Scott, D. R. (2018). The value of codesign: The effect of customer involvement in service design teams. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517714060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA, 299(2), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2007.26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, L., Morrison, L., Bradbury, K., & Muller, I. (2015). The person-based approach to intervention development: Application to digital health-related behavior change interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1), e4055. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, E., & Sangiorgi, D. (2018). Service design as an approach to implement the value cocreation perspective in new service development. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517709356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar