A Method of Empirical Q-Matrix Validation for Multidimensional Item Response Theory

References

• Ackerman, T. A. (1994). Using multidimensional item response theory to understand what items and tests are measuring. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(4), 255–278. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0704_1
   Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & B. F. Csaki (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest: Academiai Kiado.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, C. L. N., Bolfarine, H., & Andrade, D. F. (2011). Bayesian inference for a skew- normal irt model under the centred parameterization. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 55(1), 353–365. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1–29. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Liu, J., Xu, G., & Ying, Z. (2015). Statistical analysis of q-matrix based diagnostic classification models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(510), 850–866. doi:10.1080/01621459.2014.934827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, M. A., Liu, R., Huggins-Manley, A. C., & Baz´an, J. L. (2019). Incorporating the Q- matrix into multidimensional item response theory models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(4), 665–687. doi:10.1177/0013164418814898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically based method of Q-matrix validation for the dina model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(4), 343–362. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00069.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2016). A General method of empirical Q-matrix validation. Psychometrika, 81(2), 253–273. doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9467-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J., Qiu, X.-L., & Santos, K. C. (2021). An empirical q-matrix validation method for the polytomous g-dina model. Psychometrika, 87(2), 693–724. doi:10.1007/s11336-021-09821-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorov, V. V. (1972). Theory of optimal experiments. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J.-P. (2010). Bayesian item response modeling. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins-Manley, A. C., Benedict, A. E., Goodwin, A., & Templin, J. (2019). Institute of education sciences, grant number r305a190079.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, R., Huggins-Manley, A. C., & Bradshaw, L. (2017). The impact of Q-matrix designs on diagnostic classification accuracy in the presence of attribute hierarchies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(2), 220–240. doi:10.1177/0013164416645636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D. (1982). The use of the general rasch model with multi- dimensional item response data. (Tech. Rep). American Coll Testing Program Iowa City IA.
   Google Scholar
• N´ajera, P., Sorrel, M. A., de la Torre, J., & Abad, F. J. (2020). Improving robustness in q-matrix validation using an iterative and dynamic procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44(6), 431–446. doi:10.1177/0146621620909904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N.-K., & Miller, A. J. (1992). A review of some exchange algorithms for constructing discrete d-optimal designs. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 14(4), 489–498. doi:10.1016/0167-9473(92)90064-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckase, M. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory (1st ed.). New York: Springer- Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. (2010). Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. (1983). Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(4), 345–354. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Song, L., Ding, S., Meng, Y., Cao, C., & Jie, Y. (2018). An em-based method for q-matrix validation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42(6), 446–459. doi:10.1177/0146621617752991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar