450
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Feeling the weight of the water: a longitudinal study of how capital and identity shape young people’s computer science trajectories over time, age 10–21

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Received 16 Mar 2023, Accepted 14 Feb 2024, Published online: 25 Apr 2024

References

  • Antle, A. N. (2013). Research opportunities: Embodied child–computer interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.001
  • Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., King, H., Mau, A., Nomikou, E., & Seakins, A. (2017). Killing curiosity? An analysis of celebrated identity performances among teachers and students in nine London secondary science classrooms. Science Education, 101(5), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21291
  • Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., Henderson, M., Holmegaard, H., Liu, Q., Macleod, E., Mendick, H., Moote, J., & Watson, E. (2023a). ASPIRES3 summary report: Computing.
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., Henderson, M., Holmegaard, H., Liu, Q., Macleod, E., Mendick, H., Moote, J., & Watson, E. (2023b). ASPIRES3 summary report: Computing. London, UCL.
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). “Balancing acts’‘: Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031
  • Archer, L., & Francis, B. (2006). Understanding minority ethnic achievement: Race, gender, class and’success’. Routledge.
  • Archer, L., Francis, B., Moote, J., Watson, E., Henderson, M., Holmegaard, H., & MacLeod, E. (2023). Reasons for not/choosing chemistry: Why advanced level chemistry students in England do/not pursue chemistry undergraduate degrees. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(5), 978–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21822
  • Archer, L., Godec, S., & Moote, J. (2023). “My love for it just wasn’t enough to get me through”: A longitudinal case study of factors supporting and denying black British working-class young women’s science identities and trajectories. In Science identities: Theory, method and research (pp. 23–45). Springer International Publishing.
  • Archer, L., Moote, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Learning that physics is ‘not for me’: Pedagogic work and the cultivation of habitus among advanced level physics students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(3), 347–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1707679
  • Avraamidou, L. (2020). Science identity as a landscape of becoming: Rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09954-7
  • Bailey, J. L., & Stefaniak, G. (2002). Preparing the information technology workforce for the new millennium. ACM SIGCPR Computer Personnel, 20(4), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/571475.571476
  • Ball, S. J., & Vincent, C. (1998). ’I heard it on the grapevine’: ‘hot’ knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569980190307
  • Barker, L. J., Garvin-Doxas, K., & Jackson, M. (2002). Defensive climate in the computer science classroom. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, New York, NY, United States. Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Beaubouef, T. (2002). Why computer science students need math. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(4), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/820127.820166
  • Benjamin, R. (2020). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. Oxford University Press.
  • Berg, T., Sharpe, A., & Aitkin, E. (2018). Females in computing: Understanding stereotypes through collaborative picturing. Computers & Education, 126, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.007
  • Bers, M. U. (2019). Coding as another language: A pedagogical approach for teaching computer science in early childhood. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00147-3
  • Bjørn, P., Menendez-Blanco, M., & Borsotti, V. (2023). Diversity in computer science: Design artefacts for equity and inclusion. Springer Nature.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge university press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), J.G. Richardson’s handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2018). The forms of capital. In Granovetter, M., & Swedberg, R (Eds.), The sociology of economic life (pp. 78–92). Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 4). Sage.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press.
  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. On the discursive limits of “sex”. Routledge.
  • Carlone, H. B., Scott, C. M., & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 836–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21150
  • Copsey-Blake, M., Hamer, J., Kemp, P., & Wong, B. (2021). Should we be concerned about who is studying computing in schools? Understanding Computing Education Theme: Equity, diversity and inclusion in computing education, 2, 31–39.
  • Cutts, Q., Patitsas, E., Cole, E., Donaldson, P., Alshaigy, B., Gutica, M., Hellas, A., Larraza-Mendiluze, E., McCartney, R., & Riedesel, C. (2018). Early developmental activities and computing proficiency. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports, Bologna, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1145/3174781.3174789
  • Department for Education. (2013). Computing programmes of study: Key stages 1 and 2. National curriculum in England. Department of Education, England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c576be5274a1b00423213/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_Computing.pdf
  • Ezell, S. (2021). Assessing the State of Digital Skills in the US Economy. Information, technology inovation foundation. https://itif.org/publications/2021/11/29/assessing-state-digital-skills-us-economy/
  • Fowler, M. D. C. (2010). Schooling girls in a rural community: An examination of female science identity and science career choices. The University of Alabama.
  • Hamer, J. M., Kemp, P. E., Wong, B., & Copsey-Blake, M. (2023). Who wants to be a computer scientist? The computing aspirations of students in English secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 45(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2179379
  • Hamlyn, B., Hanson, T., Malam, S., Man, C., Smith, K., Williams, L., & DeWitt, J. (2020). Young people’s Views on Science Education: Science Education Tracker 2019. https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/science-education-tracker-2019.pdf
  • Hayes, L.(2020). An early exploration of gender imbalance in computing. In empowering teaching for Digital Equity and agency: IFIP TC 3. Open Conference on Computers in Education, OCCE 2020, Mumbai, India. (pp. 66–70). Springer International Publishing.
  • Henderson, H. (2018). Borrowed time: A sociological theorisation of possible selves and educational subjectivities. In Henderson, H., Stevenson, J., & Bathmaker, A. M. (Eds.), Possible selves and higher education (pp. 39–52). Routledge.
  • Holmegaard, H. T. (2015). Performing a choice-narrative: A qualitative study of the patterns in STEM students’ higher education choices. International Journal of Science Education, 37(9), 1454–1477. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1042940
  • Holmegaard, H. T., & Archer, L. (2023). Science identities: Theory, method and research (Vol. 12). Springer Nature.
  • Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Nielsen, K. B. (2023). ‘You have to ask the right questions’: A spatial analysis of the sense of belonging within higher education computer science. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(6), 1037–1050. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2254289
  • Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2014a). A journey of negotiation and belonging: Understanding students’ transitions to science and engineering in higher education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(3), 755–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9542-3
  • Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2014b). To choose or not to choose science: Constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 186–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749362
  • Holmegaard, H. T., Ulriksen, L. M., & Madsen, L. M. (2014). The process of choosing what to study: A longitudinal study of upper secondary students’ identity work when choosing higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.696212
  • Horvat, E. M., Weininger, E. B., & Lareau, A. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002319
  • House of Commons. (2016). Digital Skills Crisis. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmsctech/270/270.pdf
  • Kallia, M., & Cutts, Q. (2021). Re-examining inequalities in computer science participation from a Bourdieusian sociological perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Kemp, P., Berry, M., & Wong, B. (2018). The Roehampton annual computing education report: Data from 2017.
  • Kemp, P. E., Wong, B., & Berry, M. G. (2019). Female performance and participation in computer science: A national picture. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 20(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366016
  • Kinnunen, P., Butler, M., Morgan, M., Nylen, A., Peters, A.-K., Sinclair, J., Kalvala, S., & Pesonen, E. (2018). Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1146233
  • Kunkeler, T., & Leonard, H. C. (2021). Computing skills, beliefs and identities in young people from underserved communities. Paper presented at the 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Computing, and Technology (RESPECT).
  • Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.
  • Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 747–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240206700507
  • Margolis, J. (2017). Stuck in the shallow end (updated ed.). Education.
  • Markes, I.(2006). A review of literature on employability skill needs in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 637–650.
  • Mendick, H., Berge, M., & Danielsson, A. (2017). A critique of the stem pipeline: Young people’s identities in Sweden and science education policy. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1300232
  • Montoya, A. (2017). Computer science for all: Opportunities through a diverse teaching workforce. Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, 29, 47–62. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/computer-science-all-opportunities-through/docview/1924502808/se-2
  • Mooney, C., Becker, B. A., Salmon, L., & Mangina, E. (2018). Computer science identity and sense of belonging: A case study in Ireland. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden, May (GE@ICSE2018), 4.
  • Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Science capital or STEM capital? Exploring relationships between science capital and technology, engineering, and maths aspirations and attitudes among young people aged 17/18. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1228–1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21628
  • Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2021). Who has high science capital? An exploration of emerging patterns of science capital among students aged 17/18 in England. Research Papers in Education, 36(4), 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1678062
  • Morrison, B. B., Quinn, B., Bradley, S., Buffardi, K., Harrigton, B., Hu, H. H., Kallia, M., McNeill, F., Ola, O., & Parker, M. C. (2021). Chronicling the evidence for broadening participation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2, Germany.
  • Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression. In Algorithms of oppression. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001
  • Peters, A.-K. (2014). The role of students’ identity development in higher education in computing. Uppsala University.
  • Peters, A.-K. (2017). Learning computing at university: Participation and identity: A longitudinal study. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
  • Peters, A.-K., Bengtsson, S., Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., Grande, V., Lönngren, J., & Salminen-Karlsson, M. (2020). Care ethics to develop computing and engineering education for sustainability. Paper presented at the 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Peters, A.-K., Berglund, A., Eckerdal, A., & Pears, A. (2014). First year computer science and IT students’ experience of participation in the discipline. Paper presented at the 2014 international conference on teaching and learning in computing and engineering, Kuching, Malaysia.
  • Peters, A.-K., & Pears, A. (2013). Engagement in computer science and IT–What! A matter of identity? Paper presented at the 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering.
  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. State University of New Yorke Press.
  • Rahm, J., Gonsalves, A. J., & Lachaîne, A. (2022). Young women of color figuring science and identity within and beyond an afterschool science program. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(2), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1977646
  • Rankin, Y. A., Thomas, J. O., & Erete, S. (2021). Black women speak: Examining power, privilege, and identity in CS education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451344
  • Rodriguez, S. L., & Lehman, K. (2017). Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: The need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory. Computer Science Education, 27(3–4), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1457899
  • Ross, M., Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2020). The intersection of being black and being a woman: Examining the effect of social computing relationships on computer science career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 20(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377426
  • Rude, U., Willcox, K., McInnes, L. C., & Sterck, H. D. (2018). Research and education in computational science and engineering. Siam Review, 60(3), 707–754. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1096840
  • Santo, R., Vogel, S., & Ching, D. (2019). CS for what? Diverse visions of computer science education in practice. CSforALL.
  • Shapiro, L., & Stolz, S. A. (2019). Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education, 17(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518822149
  • Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture Routledge. Taylor & Fracis Group.
  • Strayhorn, T. L. (2018). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge.
  • Takács, R., Kárász, J. T., Takács, S., Horváth, Z., & Oláh, A. (2021). Applying the Rasch model to analyze the effectiveness of education reform in order to decrease computer science students’ dropout. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00725-w
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college. Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2 ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
  • Tolstrup Holmegaard, H. (2021). Master students’ imagined futures. The interaction of students’ resources, narrative repertoires and their thoughts about postgraduate futures within selected STEM master programmes. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(7), 1217–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1789213
  • Ulriksen, L., Madsen, L. M., & Holmegaard, H. T. (2010). What do we know about explanations for drop out/opt out among young people from STM higher education programmes? Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 209–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504549
  • Vergara, C. E., Urban-Lurain, M., Dresen, C., Coxen, T., MacFarlane, T., Frazier, K., Buch, N., Esfahanian, A. H., Paquette, L., Sticklen, J., LaPrad, J., Frazier, K., & Wolff, T. F. (2009). Aligning computing education with engineering workforce computational needs: New curricular directions to improve computational thinking in engineering graduates. Paper presented at the 2009 39th IEEE frontiers in education conference, San Antonio, TX.
  • Vitores, A., & Gil-Juárez, A. (2016). The trouble with ‘women in computing’: A critical examination of the deployment of research on the gender gap in computer science. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(6), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1087309
  • Vrieler, T., & Salminen-Karlsson, M. (2022). A Sociocultural perspective on computer science capital and its pedagogical implications in computer science education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 22(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487052
  • Winter, E., Thomas, L., & Blair, L. (2021). ‘It’s a Bit Weird, but it’s OK’? How Female Computer Science Students Navigate being a Minority. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, Germany.
  • Wong, B. (2016). ‘I’m good, but not that good’: Digitally-skilled young people’s identity in computing. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1292604
  • Wong, B., ElMorally, R., & Copsey-Blake, M. (2021). ‘Fair and square’: What do students think about the ethnicity degree awarding gap? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(8), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1932773
  • Wong, B., & Kemp, P. E. (2018). Technical boys and creative girls: The career aspirations of digitally skilled youths. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1325443
  • Yates, J., & Plagnol, A. C. (2022). Female computer science students: A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences studying computer science at university in the UK. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3079–3105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10743-5
  • Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2004). Retention and student success in higher education. Open University Press.
  • Zhou, N., Cao, Y., Jacob, S., & Richardson, D. (2020). Teacher perceptions of equity in high school computer science classrooms. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 20(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410633