Procedural fairness in ethnic-cultural decision-making: Benefits, processes and minority and majority group perspectives

References

• Amiot, C. E., Sansfaçon, S., Louis, W. R., & Yelle, M. (2012). Can intergroup behaviors be emitted out of self-determined reasons? Testing the role of group norms and behavioral congruence in the internalization of discrimination and parity behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211429804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. F. (2013). Diagnosing discrimination: Stress from perceived racism and the mental and physical health effects. Sociological Inquiry, 83(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.2012.00433.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzi, A. E. (1992). Procedural justice and the allocation of power in intergroup relations: Studies in the United States and South Africa. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(6), 736–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292186010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzi, A. E. (1993). Group representation and procedural justice in multigroup decision-making bodies. Social Justice Research, 6(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01048477
   Google Scholar
• Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.00337.x
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, D. (2023, June 9). Opmerkelijke actie van Gentse rechters na Reuzegom-ophef: ‘We gaan vragen en bezorgdheden van jongeren beantwoorden’. De Morgen. https://www.demorgen.be/snelnieuws/opmerkelijke-actie-van-gentse-rechters-na-reuzegom-ophef-we-gaan-vragen-en-bezorgdheden-van-jongeren-beantwoorden~bc48a6da/
   Google Scholar
• Beugré, C. D. (2012). Development and validation of a deontic justice scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2163–2190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00935.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockner, J. (1996). Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 390–413). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n18
   Google Scholar
• Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2005). How, when, and why does outcome favorability interact with procedural fairness? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 525–553). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D., & Jacoby-Senghor, D. S. (2021). Majority members misperceive even ‘win-win’ diversity policies as unbeneficial to them. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 122(6), 1075–1097. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrega, C., & Allen, K. (2020, July 18). Historians debate America’s history of racism and confederate monuments. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/US/historians-debate-americas-sordid-history-racism-confederate-monuments/story?id=71486827#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20poll%2C%20in,Hispanic%20and%2044%25%20are%20white.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. (2013, April 17). Immigration, population and ethnicity: The UK in international perspective. The Migration Observatory. Retrieved from https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/immigration-population-and-ethnicity-the-uk-in-international-perspective/
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Hill, E. T., & De Cremer, D. (2023). Forever focused on fairness: 75 years of organizational justice in personnel Psychology. Personnel Psychology, 76(2), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Science, 96(4), 608–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.608
   Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 164–209. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decré, H. (2023, June 1). De uitspraak is gevallen, de woede blijft: Waarom de zaak-Sanda Dia zo nazindert. Vrtnews. https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2023/06/01/sanda-dia/
   Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., Brockner, J., Fishman, A., Van Dijke, M., Van Olffen, W., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees’ work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 858–866. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx, K., Depauw, H., Haesevoets, T., Valcke, B., Van Roey, T., Van de Putte, B., De Cremer, D., & Van Hiel, A. (2023). The effects of ethnic-cultural procedural fairness on Organizational identification and job satisfaction among minority and majority group employees. Applied Psychology International Review.
   Google Scholar
• Dierckx, K., Politi, E., Valcke, B., Van Assche, J., & Van Hiel, A. (2020). The “Ironic” fair process effect: A perceived fair naturalization procedure spurs anti-immigration attitudes through increased national identification among naturalized citizens. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220975480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx, K., Valcke, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2021). The trickle-down effect of procedural fairness on perceptions of daily discrimination: How societal actors can build social trust among minority members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx, K., Van Hiel, A., Swart, H., & Valcke, B. (2023). The irony of fairness: How procedural fairness climate perceptions can hinder disadvantaged group members’ support for social change. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231151941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx, K., Van Hiel, A., & Valcke, B. (2020). Do minorities perceive procedural fairness merely in terms of ethnic bias suppression? Evaluation of the concept of fairness in multicultural conflicts. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(13), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1726733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx, K., Van Hiel, A., Valcke, B., Sekwena, E. K., De Souter, L., Braet, J., & Haesevoets, T. (2022). What drives the perceived prejudice asymmetry among advantaged group members? The mediating role of social group power and moral obligations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(5–6), 860–880. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx, K., Van Hiel, A., Valcke, B., & van den Bos, K. (2023). Procedural fairness in ethnic-cultural decision-making: Fostering social cohesion by incorporating minority and majority perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1025153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1025153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinesen, P. T., & Hooghe, M. (2010). When in Rome, do as the romans do: The acculturation of generalized trust among immigrants in Western Europe. International Migration Review, 44(3), 697–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00822.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover, T. L., Major, B., & Kaiser, C. R. (2014). Diversity initiatives, status, and system-justifying beliefs: When and how diversity efforts de-legitimize discrimination claims. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(4), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213502560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterbrook, M., & Vignoles, V. L. (2012). Different groups, different motives: Identity motives underlying changes in identification with novel groups. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 1066–1080. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212444614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folger, R. (1998). Fairness as moral virtue. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (pp. 13–34). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (Vol. 1, pp. 3–33). Information Age Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (2000). General health questionnaire (GHQ). NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Goldspink, C., & Kay, R. (2004). Bridging the micro–macro divide: A new basis for social science. Human Relations, 57(5), 597–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704044311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 985–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00039-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, A. S., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2020). The New Psychology of leadership. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helms, J. E. (Ed.). (1990). Contributions in Afro-American and African studies, No. 129. Black and White racial identity: Theory, research, and practice. https://doi.org/10.2307/2073777
   Google Scholar
• Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, Y. J., & Tyler, T. R. (2000). How different ethnic groups react to legal authority. Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Huo, Y. J., & Tyler, T. R. (2001). Ethnic diversity and the viability of organizations: The role of procedural justice in bridging differences. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organization justice (pp. 213–244). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B., Victor, K. F., & Vannette, D. (2019). Alien citizens and the canonical immigrant: Do stigmatized attributes affect Latina/o judgment about discrimination? American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 740–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachanoff, F. J., Taylor, D. M., Caouette, J., Khullar, T. H., & Wohl, M. J. (2019). The Chains on all my people are the Chains on me: Restrictions to collective autonomy undermine the personal autonomy and psychological well-being of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachanoff, F. J., Wohl, M. J., Koestner, R., & Taylor, D. M. (2020). Them, us, and I: How group contexts influence basic psychological needs. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419884318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, C. R., Drury, B. J., Spalding, K. E., Cheryan, S., & O’Brien, L. T. (2009). The ironic consequences of Obama’s election: Decreased support for social justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, R. C., Mickelson, K. D., & Williams, D. R. (1999). The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40(3), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, D., & Thomas, D. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.10061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzieri, G. (2011). Fewer, older and multicultural? Projections of the EU populations by foreign/national background. Eurostat Methodologies and Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Weiss (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Lodewijckx, E. (2014). Personen met migratieachtergrond: verschillende definities, verschillende kenmerken. Studie van de Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, F., & Vertovec, S. (2015). Comparing super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(4), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.980295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murillo, L. A., & Smith, P. H. (2011). “I will never forget that”: Lasting effects of language discrimination on language-minority Children in Colombia and on the U.S.-Mexico border. Childhood Education, 87(3), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2011.10521714
   Google Scholar
• Peate, V. G., Platow, M. J., & Eggins, R. A. (2008). Collective voice and support for social protest among indigenous and non-indigenous Australians: Considering the role of procedural fairness in an intergroup conflict of interest. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60(3), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530701867847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2008). US Population Projections: 2005-2050. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2008/02/11/us-population-projections-2005-2050/
   Google Scholar
• Platow, M. J., Brewer, G., & Eggins, R. A. (2008). Authorities’ knowledge of shared group membership and its effects on the respect-informing properties of procedural fairness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 743–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platow, M. J., Eggins, R. A., Chattopadhyay, R., Brewer, G., Hardwick, L., Milsom, L., Brocklebank, J., Lalor, T., Martin, R., Quee, M., Vassallo, S., & Welsh, J. (2013). Two experimental tests of relational models of procedural justice: Non-instrumental voice and authority group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02083.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platow, M. J., Reid, S., & Andrew, S. (1998). Leadership endorsement: The role of distributive and procedural behavior in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430298011004
   Google Scholar
• Priest, N., Paradies, Y., Trenerry, B., Truong, M., Karlsen, S., & Kelly, Y. (2013). A systematic review of studies examining the relationship between reported racism and health and wellbeing for children and young people. Social Science & Medicine, 95, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. Free Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62397-6_12
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the Twenty‐first century: The 2006 Johan skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasking, J. (2013, October 29). ‘Doe niet alsof alle werknemers gelijk zijn’. De Standaard. https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20131028_00814169
   Google Scholar
• Roberge, M. É., & Van Dick, R. (2010). Recognizing the benefits of diversity: When and how does diversity increase group performance? Human Resource Management Review, 20(4), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreuer, M. (2019, January 5). Belgium Bans Religious Slaughtering Practices, Drawing Praise and Protest. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/05/world/europe/belgium-ban-jewish-muslim-animal-slaughter.html
   Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (Eds.). (2001). Individual self, relational self, and collective self. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. S. (2010). Race and trust. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., Huo, Y. J., Ortiz, D. J., & Lind, E. A. (1998). The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(5), 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sue, D. W., Bucceri, J., Lin, A. I., Nadal, K. L., & Torino, G. C. (2007). Racial microaggressions and the Asian American experience. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thijssen, L., van Tubergen, F., Coenders, M., Hellpap, R., & Jak, S. (2021). Discrimination of black and muslim minority groups in Western societies: Evidence from a meta-analysis of field experiments. International Migration Review, 56(3), 843–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211045044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, L. (2009). Institutions and activism: Crisis and opportunity for a German Labor Movement in decline. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 62(3), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390906200302
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). Self-categorization theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psycholog (pp. 399–418). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the Law. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(C), 115–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60283-x
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., Lind, E. A., Ohbuchi, K. I., Sugawara, I., & Huo, Y. J. (1998). Conflict with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298242003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). An Older and More Diverse Nation by Midcentury. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb08-123.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2014a). Foreign-born: 2014: Current population survey detailed tables (Report No. CPS-2014). Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2014/demo/foreign-born/cps-2014.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2014b). U.S. Poverty Report. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2014.html
   Google Scholar
• Valcke, B., Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., & Dierckx, K. (2020). Procedural fairness enacted by societal actors increases social trust and social acceptance among ethnic minority members through the promotion of sense of societal belonging. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(10), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcke, B., Van Hiel, A., Van Roey, T., Van de Putte, B., & Dierckx, K. (2020). Societal actors shape collective identities of minorities: Procedural fairness climate effects on identification, subjective well-being and psychological health. Social Justice Research, 33(4), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-020-00357-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1–60). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. A. W. (2001). The Psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace from theory to practice (Vol. 12, pp. 49–66). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600301-9
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A., & Lind, E. A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1449–1458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2008). How leader prototypicality affects followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701743491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignoles, V. L., Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Golledge, J., & Scabini, E. (2006). Beyond self-esteem: Influence of multiple motives on identity construction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 308–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wax, E. (2019, August 19). Belgium tests EU rules on halal and kosher slaughter. PoliticoPro. https://www.politico.eu/article/belgium-becomes-eu-test-case-on-halal-and-kosher-slaughter-religious-freedoms-animal-welfare/
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., Lawrence, J. A., Davis, B. A., & Vu, C. (2019). Understanding how discrimination can affect health. Health Services Research, 54(S2), 1374–1388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2013). Racism and health I: Pathways and scientific evidence. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(8), 1152–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213487340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar