Face–context integration and trustworthiness evaluation

References

• Aguado, L., Dieguez-Risco, T., Villalba-García, C., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2019). Double-checking emotions: Valence and emotion category in contextual integration of facial expressions of emotion. Biological Psychology, 146, 107723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, D. L., Fiske, S. T., & Todorov, A. (2011). Impression formation: A focus on others’ intents. In J. Decety & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), The oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 419–433). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342161.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Aviezer, H., Bentin, S., Dudarev, V., & Hassin, R. R. (2011). The automaticity of emotional face-context integration. Emotion, 11(6), 1406–1414. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviezer, H., Hassin, R. R., Ryan, J., Grady, C., Susskind, J., Anderson, A., Moscovitch, M., & Bentin, S. (2008). Angry, disgusted, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychological Science, 19(7), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02148.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010). Context is routinely encoded during emotion perception. Psychological Science, 21(4), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., & Gendron, M. (2011). Context in emotion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). The international affective digitized sounds (2nd ed., IADS-2): Affective ratings of sounds and instruction manual. Technical report B-3. University of Florida
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Biella, M., & Freeman, J. B. (2018). The influence of visual context on the evaluation of facial trustworthiness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Pagliaro, S., & Ellemers, N. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., Cherubini, P., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., & Goodwin, G. (2021a). The primacy of morality in impression development: Theory, research, and future directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 187–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Masi, M., Mattavelli, S., & Biella, M. (2021b). Faces and sounds becoming one: Cross-modal integration of facial and auditory cues in judging trustworthiness. Social cognition, 39, 315–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinol, P., Petty, R. E., & McCaslin, M. J. (2009). Changing attitudes on implicit versus explicit measures: What is the difference? In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Brinol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 285–326). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bublatzky, F., Kavcıoğlu, F., Guerra, P., Doll, S., & Junghöfer, M. (2020). Contextual information resolves uncertainty about ambiguous facial emotions: Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates. Neuroimage: Reports, 215, 116814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116814
   Google Scholar
• Campanella, S., & Belin, P. (2007). Integrating face and voice in person perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L. J., Doll, B. B., Van’t Wout, M., Frank, M. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010). Seeing is believing: Trustworthiness as a dynamic belief. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, 163, 163–228.
   Google Scholar
• De Gelder, B. (2006). Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gelder, B., Meeren, H. K., Righart, R., Van den Stock, J., Van de Riet, W. A., & Tamietto, M. (2006). Beyond the face: Exploring rapid influences of context on face processing. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55003-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12111
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.28046
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Moors, A. (2013). What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0386-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., & Hughes, S. (2016). Evaluative conditioning as a symbolic phenomenon: On the relation between evaluative conditioning, evaluative conditioning via instructions, and persuasion. Social Cognition, 34(5), 480–494. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotsch, R., & Todorov, A. (2012). Reverse correlating social face perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611430272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H., Langner, O., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2008). Ethnic out-group faces are biased in the prejudiced mind. Psychological Science, 19(10), 978–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02186.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Y., Hsieh, T. S., Wang, R. R., & Wang, Z. (2020). Entrepreneurs’ facial trustworthiness, gender, and crowdfunding success. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, J., Siegel, S., & Young, L. (2012). Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Review of Financial Studies, 25(8), 2455–2484. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ert, E., Fleischer, A., & Magen, N. (2016). Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb. Tourism Management, 55, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., & Unkelbach, C. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.513497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foo, Y. Z., Sutherland, C. A. M., Burton, N. S., Nakagawa, S., & Rhodes, G. (2022). Accuracy in facial trustworthiness impressions: Kernel of truth or modern physiognomy? A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(11), 1580–1596. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211048110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). More than meets the eye: Split-second social perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., Ma, Y., Han, S., & Ambady, N. (2013). Influences of culture and visual context on real-time social categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hassin, R., & Trope, Y. (2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, U., Dietrich, J., Kafetsios, K., Elkabetz, S., & Hareli, S. (2020). The bidirectional influence of emotion expressions and context: Emotion expressions, situational information and real-world knowledge combine to inform observers’ judgments of both the emotion expressions and the situation. Cognition and Emotion, 34(3), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1651252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., Ye, Y., Van Dessel, P., & De Houwer, J. (2019). When people co-occur with good or bad events: Graded effects of relational qualifiers on evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218781340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, B., Oud, B., Williams, T., Krumhuber, E. G., Fehr, E., & Engelmann, J. B. (2022). Can people detect the trustworthiness of strangers based on their facial appearance? Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, B., Sleegers, W. W. A., Evans, A. M., Stel, M., & van Beest, I. (2019). The effects of facial attractiveness and trustworthiness in online peer-to-peer markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75, Article 102125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzir, M., & Posten, A.-C. (2023). Are there dominant response tendencies for social reactions? Trust trumps mistrust—evidence from a dominant behavior measure (DBM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. S., & Gardner, E. M. (2020). Facial trustworthiness and criminal sentencing: A comment on Wilson and rule (2015). Psychological Reports, 123, 1854–1868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119889582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, B., & Castano, E. (2012). Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., Keles, U., & Adolphs, R. (2021). Four dimensions characterize comprehensive trait judgments of faces. Nature Communications, 12(1), 5168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25500-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., & Martin, D. (2007). A boy primed sue: Feature-based processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangini, M. C., & Biederman, I. (2004). Making the ineffable explicit: Estimating the information employed for face classifications. Cognitive Science, 28(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2802_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda, T., Ellsworth, P. C., Mesquita, B., Leu, J., Tanida, S., & Van de Veerdonk, E. (2008). Placing the face in context: Cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattavelli, S., Fiamberti, G. C., Masi, M., & Brambilla, M. (2023). The “happy face killer” in the eyes of the beholder: Relational encoding of facial emotions in context influences trustworthiness attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 109, 104517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattavelli, S., Masi, M., & Brambilla, M. (2022). Untrusted under threat: On the superior bond between trustworthiness and threat in face-context integration. Cognition and Emotion, 36(7), 1273–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2103100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattavelli, S., Masi, M., & Brambilla, M. (2023). Not just about faces in context: Face–context relation moderates the impact of contextual threat on facial trustworthiness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(3), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211065933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90(3), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeren, H. K., van Heijnsbergen, C. C., & de Gelder, B. (2005). Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(45), 16518–16523. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507650102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2013). The effect of object–valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 27(4), 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.732040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neta, M., Davis, F. C., & Whalen, P. J. (2011). Valence resolution of ambiguous facial expressions using an emotional oddball task. Emotion, 11(6), 1425–1433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivola, C. Y., Funk, F., & Todorov, A. (2014). Social attributions from faces bias human choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11087–11092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805664105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., Ten Brinke, L., & Gustaw, C. (2010). Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(6), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160902926141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourtois, G., De Gelder, B., Vroomen, J., Rossion, B., & Crommelinck, M. (2000). The time-course of intermodal binding between seeing and hearing affective information. Neuroreport, 11(6), 1329–1333. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200004270-00036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezlescu, C., Duchaine, B., Olivola, C. Y., Chater, N., & Rustichini, A. (2012). Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior. Public Library of Science One, 7(3), e34293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034293
   Google Scholar
• Richeson, J. A., & Trawalter, S. (2005). On the categorization of admired and disliked exemplars of admired and disliked racial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righart, R., & De Gelder, B. (2006). Context influences early perceptual analysis of faces—an electrophysiological study. Cerebral Cortex, 16(9), 1249–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righart, R., & De Gelder, B. (2008). Recognition of facial expressions is influenced by emotional scene gist. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(3), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.3.264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rougier, M., Schmitz, M., & Yzerbyt, V. (2021). When my actions shape your looks: Experience-based properties of approach/avoidance bias the visual representation of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(5), 1146–1174. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Krendl, A. C., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2012). A memory advantage for untrustworthy faces. Cognition, 125(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slepian, M. L., Young, S. G., Rule, N. O., Weisbuch, M., & Ambady, N. (2012). Embodied impression formation: Social judgments and motor cues to approach and avoidance. Social Cognition, 30(2), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.2.232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirrat, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21(3), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, C. A., & Young, A. W. (2022). Understanding trait impressions from faces. British Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 1056–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamietto, M., Latini Corazzini, L., de Gelder, B., & Geminiani, G. (2006). Functional asymmetry and interhemispheric cooperation in the perception of emotions from facial expressions. Experimental Brain Research, 171(3), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0279-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Dotsch, R., Porter, J. M., Oosterhof, N. N., & Falvello, V. B. (2013). Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13(4), 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., & Duchaine, B. (2008). Reading trustworthiness in faces without recognizing faces. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290802044996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., & Oh, D. (2021). The structure and perceptual basis of social judgments from faces. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 189–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R., & Mende Siedlecki, P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27(6), 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 211–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60239-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Toorn, J., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2015). The threat of moral transgression: The impact of group membership and moral opportunity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(5), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieser, M. J., & Brosch, T. (2012). Faces in context: A review and systematization of contextual influences on affective face processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. P., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Facial trustworthiness predicts extreme criminal-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615590992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O’Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5(3), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Stroud, J. N. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age. Law and Human Behavior, 26(6), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020981501383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, S. Y., Thai, S., & Hehman, E. (2023). Everyday perceiver-context influences on impression formation: No evidence of consistent effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221085088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar