References
- Agyapong, B., Obuobi-Donkor, G., Burback, L., & Wei, Y. (2022). Stress, burnout, anxiety and depression among teachers: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710706
- Au, W. (2007). High stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative meta synthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
- Bender, R. (1999). Multiple test procedures other than Bonferroni’s deserve wider use. BMJ, 318(7183), 600. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7183.600a
- Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151
- Bradbury, A. (2019). Pressure, anxiety and collateral damage. The headteachers’ verdict on SATs. More than a score. https://www.morethanascore.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/SATs-research.pdf
- Brockmeier, L., Green, R., Pate, J., Tsemunhu, R., & Bochenko, M. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs about the effects of high stakes testing. Journal of Education & Human Development, 3(4), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a9
- Cizek, G. J. (2001). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement Issues & Practice, 20(4), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00072.x
- Demir, C., & Keleş, O. (2021). The impact of high-stakes testing on the teaching and learning processes of mathematics. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021269677
- Department for Education. (2022). Information for parents: 2022 multiplication tables check. Department for Education, England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1031901/2022_Information_for_parents_Multiplication_tables_check.pdf
- Gonzalez, A., Peters, M., Orange, A., & Grigsby, B. (2017). The influence of high-stakes testing on teacher self-efficacy and job-related stress. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1214237
- Gunn, J., Al-Bataineh, A., & Abu Al-Rub, W. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of high-stakes testing. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 4(2), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2016.4.2.003
- Hargreaves, A. (2020). Large-scale assessments and their effects: The case of mid-stakes tests in Ontario. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09380-5
- Högberg, B., & Horn, D. (2022). National high-stakes testing, gender, and school stress in Europe: A difference-in-differences analysis. European Sociological Review, 38(6), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac009
- Jerrim, J., & Sims, S.(2019). The teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018: June 2019. Department for Education (DFE).
- Klinger, D., & Rogers, T. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of large-scale assessment programs within low-stakes accountability frameworks. International Journal of Testing, 11(2), 122–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2011.552748
- Kolenikov, S. (2016). Post-stratification or a non-response adjustment? Survey Practice, 9(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2016-0014
- Lotz, C., & Sparfeldt, J. (2017). Does test anxiety increase as the exam draws near? – Students’ state test anxiety recorded over the course of one semester. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 397–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.032
- Mathison, S., & Freeman, M. (2006). Teacher stress and high stakes testing. How using one measure of academic success leads to multiple teacher stressors. Understanding Teacher Stress in an Age of Accountability, 43–63. https://www.infoagepub.com/index.php?id=18&p=1-59311-474-5
- More Than a Score. (2022). A parents’ guide to primary testing. https://www.morethanascore.org.uk/what-we-do/parents-guide/year-5/?scrollto=content
- National Education Union. (2019). Too much testing. https://NEU1303 Scrap the SATs ballot crib sheet for web v1_0.pdf
- Nichols, S. L., & Harris, L. R. (2016). Accountability assessment’s effects on teachers and schools. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 40–56). Routledge.
- Nwoko, J. C., Emeto, T. I., Malau-Aduli, A. E. O., & Malau-Aduli, B. S. (2023). A systematic review of the factors that influence teachers’ occupational wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(12), 6070. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126070
- Ofsted. (2019). Exploring the issue of off-rolling. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/936524/Ofsted_offrolling_report_YouGov_090519.pdf
- Page, D. (2017). Conceptualising the surveillance of teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(7), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1218752
- Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
- Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2020). What motivates people to teach, and why do they leave? Accountability, performativity and teacher retention. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417
- Reese, M., Gordon, S., & Price, L. (2004). Teachers’ perceptions of high-stakes testing. Journal of School Leadership, 14(5), 464–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460401400501
- Saminsky, A. (2011). High-stakes standardized testing: A panacea or a pest? Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse, 3(1). http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/373/high-stakes-standardized-testing-a-panacea-or-a-pest
- Smith, W., & Holloway, J. (2020). School testing culture and teacher satisfaction. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(4), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09342-8
- Supovitz, J. (2009). Can high stakes testing leverage educational improvement? Prospects from the last decade of testing and accountability reform. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9105-2
- Teacher Tapp. (2020). Who is on Teacher Tapp? (And why?!). https://teachertapp.co.uk/not-like-others-teacher-tapp-who-sample-representative-reweights/
- Teacher Tapp. (2022a). All things SATs and what’s going on with study leave? This, and more … https://teachertapp.co.uk/all-things-sats-and-whats-going-on-with-study-leave-this-and-more/
- Teacher Tapp. (2022b). How we ‘weight’ the Teacher Tapp sample. https://teachertapp.co.uk/articles/some-tappers-are-worth-more-than-others-how-we-weight-the-teacher-tapp-sample-2/
- TES. (2018). Exclusive: Sats take toll on teachers’ mental health. Retrived from https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/exclusive-sats-take-toll-teachers-mental-health
- Tucker, F., & Horton, J. (2019). “The show must go on!” Fieldwork, mental health and wellbeing in geography, earth and environmental sciences. Area, 51(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12437
- West, A., & Pennell, H. (2006). Market-oriented reforms and “high stakes” testing: Incentives and consequences. In A. Vinokur Ed. Pouvoirs et Mesure En Éducation. Cahiers de la recherche sur l’education and savoirs (1/2005) (pp. 181–199). Maison Des Sciences De L’homme.