Aided-speaking students’ unsolicited questions in teacher-fronted classroom talk: the use of speech-generating devices to ask questions

References

• Andzik, N. R., Y.-C. Chung, and M. Kranak. 2016. “Communication Opportunities for Elementary School Students Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 32 (4): 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1241299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, P., and I. Hörmeyer. 2017. “Achieving Intersubjectivity in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC): Intercorporeal, Embodied, and Disembodied Practices.” In Incorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, edited by C. Meyer, J. Streeck, and S. Jordan, 323–360. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BCI. 2023. “Blissymbolics.org.” https://www.blissymbolics.org/.accessed2023.04.04.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., and J. Light. 2008. “The Morphology and Syntax of Individuals who use AAC: Research Review and Implications for Effective Practice.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 24 (2): 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701830587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. 2020. Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG-2). Enschede, the Netherlands: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bockgård, G. 2007. “Syntax och prosodi vid turbytesplatser. Till beskrivning av svenskans turtagning.” In Interaktion och kontext. Nio studier av svenska samtal, edited by E. Engdahl and A.-M. Londen, 139–183. Lund: Lunds studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Bourque, K., and H. Goldstein. 2020. “Expanding Communication Modalities and Functions for Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Secondary Analysis of a Peer Partner Speech-Generating Device Intervention.” Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research 63 (1): 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., and J. Osborne. 2008. “Students’ Questions: A Potential Resource for Teaching and Learning Science.” Studies in Science Education 44 (1): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y.-C., E. Carter, and L. Sisco. 2012. “Social Interactions of Students with Disabilities Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Inclusive Classrooms.” American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities 117 (5): 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Church, A., and A. Bateman. 2019. “Children’s Right to Participate: How Can Teachers Extend Child-Initiated Learning Sequences?.” International Journal of Early Childhood 51 (3): 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-019-00250-7.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., and W. Ray. 2013. “Communicative Competence in Children’s Peer Interaction.” In Aided Communication in Everyday Interaction, edited by N. Norén, C. Samuelsson, and C. Plejert, 23–57. Guildford: J & R Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., G. Soto, and K. Nelson. 2017. “Language Learning, Recasts, and Interaction Involving AAC: Background and Potential for Intervention.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 33 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1278130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., and R. Wilkinson. 2007. “Interaction Between Children with Cerebral Palsy and Their Peers 1: Organizing and Understanding VOCA Use.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 23 (4): 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701390350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., and R. Wilkinson. 2008. “Interaction between Children with Cerebral Palsy and their Peers 2: Understanding Initiated VOCA Mediated Turns.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 24 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701390400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., and M. Selting, eds. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, F., and R. van Compernolle. 2020. “Topic Management and Student Initiation in an Advanced Chinese-as-a-Foreign-Language Classroom.” Classroom Discourse 11 (1): 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1563799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, D., and O. Sert. 2021. “Student-Initiated Multi-Unit Questions in EMI Classrooms.” Linguistics & Education 65:100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekström, A., O. Sandgren, B. Sahlén, and C. Samuelsson. 2023. “‘It Depends on Who I’m with’: How Young People with Developmental Language Disorder Describe their Experiences of Language and Communication in School.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garton, S. 2012. “Speaking Out of Turn? Taking the Initiative in Teacher-Fronted Classroom Interaction.” Classroom Discourse 3 (1): 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.666022.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1978. “Response Cries.” Language 54 (4): 787–815. https://doi.org/10.2307/413235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayano, K. 2012. “Question Design in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 395–414. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984a. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984b. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Camebridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., K. Fulcher, and S. Jennifer. 2016. “Time and Timing in Interactions Involving Individuals with Als, their Unimpaired Partners and their Speech Generating Devices.” In The Silent Partner?: Language, Interaction and Aided Communication, edited by M. Smith, 199–227. New Jersey, UK: J & R Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, E., and R. Clift, eds. 2006. “Reporting Talk : Reported Speech in Interaction.” In Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Vol. 24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacknick, C. 2009. “A Conversation-Analytic Account of Student-initiated Participation in An Esl Classroom.” Education in Teachers College, PhD thesis, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by G. H. Lerner, 13–31. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L., and G. Kasper. 2018. “Clarification Requests as a Method of Pursuing Understanding in CLIL Physics Lectures.” Classroom Discourse 9 (3): 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1477608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardas Isler, N., B. Ufuk, and A. E. Sahin. 2019. “The Interactional Management of Learner Initiatives in Social Studies Classroom Discourse.” Learning, Culture & Social Interaction 23:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. 2002. “A Conversation Analytic Study of Yes/No Questions which Convey Reversed Polarity Assertions.” Journal of pragmatics 34 (12): 1851–1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00057-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., and D. McNaughton. 2012. “Supporting the Communication, Language, and Literacy Development of Children with Complex Communication Needs: State of the Science and Future Research Priorities.” Assistive Technology 24:34–44. 10.1080/10400435.2011.648717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., and D. McNaughton. 2013. “Putting People First: Re-Thinking the Role of Technology in Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 29 (4): 299–309. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.848935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindwall, O., and G. Lymer. 2014. “Inquiries of the Body: Novice Questions and the Instructable Observability of Endodontic Scenes.” Discourse Studies 16 (2): 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613514672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorah, E. R., J. Miller, and B. Griffen. 2021. “The Acquisition of Peer Manding Using a Speech-Generating Device in Naturalistic Classroom Routines.” Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities 33 (4): 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-020-09762-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. ”“What Time Is It, Denise?”: Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse.” Theory into practice 18 (4): 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846.
   Google Scholar
• Merke, S. 2018. “Challenging and Objecting: Functions of Third Position Turns in Student-Initiated Question Sequences.” Hacettepe University Journal of Education 33:298–315. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018038808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury, C. F., D. Gooch, C. Wray, G. Baird, T. Charman, E. Simonoff, G. Vamvakas, and A. Pickles. 2016. “The Impact of Nonverbal Ability on Prevalence and Clinical Presentation of Language Disorder: Evidence from a Population Study.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 57 (11): 1247–1257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén, N., E. Svensson, and J. Telford. 2013. “Participants ’Dynamic Orientation to Folder Navigation when Using a VOCA with a Touch Screen in Talk-in-Interaction.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 29 (1): 20–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.767555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. 2013. “Gaze in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 308–329. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Savolainen, I., A. Klippi, T. Tykkyläinen, J. Higginbotham, and K. Launonen. 2020. “The Structure of Participants’ Turn-Transition Practices in Aided Conversations that Use Speechoutput Technologies.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 36 (1): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2019.1698652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2017. “Creating Opportunities for L2 Learning in a Prediction Activity.” System 70:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFS. 1993. Lag (1993:387) om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade Sveriges riksdag. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-1993387-om-stod-och-service-till-vissa_sfs-1993-387/.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. 2010. Skollag (2010:800). Sveriges riksdag. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800/.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., and T. Stivers. 2014. The handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Solem, M. S. 2016a. “Negotiating Knowledge Claims: Students’ Assertions in Classroom Interactions.” Discourse Studies 18 (6): 737–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616668072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solem, M. S. 2016b. “Displaying Knowledge through Interrogatives in Student-Initiated Sequences.” Classroom Discourse 7 (1): 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2015.1095105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørum, H., K. Raaen, and R. Gonzalez. 2021. Can Zoom Replace The Classroom? Perceptions on Digital Learning in Higher Education Within It. 20th European Conference on e-Learning, Berlin, Germany: University of Applied Sciences HTW.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. 2010. “An Overview of the Question–Response System in American English Conversation.” Journal of pragmatics 42 (10): 2772–2781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegler, H., I. Demmelmaier, M. Blom Johansson, and N. Norén. 2020. “Creating a Response Space in Multiparty Classroom Settings for Students using Eye-gaze Accessed Speech-Generating Devices.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 36 (4): 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1811758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiemann-Bourque, K. S., S. McGuff, and H. Goldstein. 2019. “Training Peer Partners to Use a Speech-Generating Device With Classmates With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Exploring Communication Outcomes Across Preschool Contexts (vol 60, pg 2648, 2017).” Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research 62 (4): 1015–1015. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Balen, M. N. G. Johanna, S. de Vries, and T. Koole. 2022. “Taking Learner Initiatives within Classroom Discussions with Room for Subjectification.” Classroom Discourse, 1–20. ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2022.2128689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, V. L., and Y.-C. Chung. 2022. “Augmentative and Alternative Communication in an Elementary School Setting: A Case Study.” Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools 53 (1): 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2011. “Learner Initiatives and Learning Opportunities in the Language Classroom.” Classroom Discourse 2 (2): 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2011.614053.
   Google Scholar