Arguing with objects and bodies: embodied reasoning and material entanglements in science learner interaction

References

• Barton, A. C., and E. Tan. 2010. ““We Be burnin’!” Agency, Identity, and Science Learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (2): 187–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, K. M., C. G. Wilson, R. T. Williams, B. Tikoff, and T. F. Shipley. 2022. “Explicit Instruction of Scientific Uncertainty in an Undergraduate Geoscience Field-Based Course.” Science & Education 31 (6): 1541–1566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00345-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilmes, J. 2019. “Regrading as a Conversational Practice.” Journal of Pragmatics 150:80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and S. Adolphs. 2023. “Towards a Speech–Gesture Profile of Pragmatic Markers: The Case of “You know”.” Journal of Pragmatics 210:36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. C., M. J. Benus, and J. Hernandez. 2019. “Managing Uncertainty in Scientific Argumentation.” Science Education 103 (5): 1235–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, S. S., and M. W. Cole. 2021. “Jostling Isaac: Dynamic Configurations of Bodies and Objects During a Language Problem Solving Event.” Classroom Discourse 12 (1–2): 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1867593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. 2011. “Elements of Formulation.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, edited by C. Goodwin, J. Streeck, and C. D. LeBaron, 59–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., and P. Kockelman, eds. 2017. Distributed Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda, C., and M. Burdelski. 2019. “Multimodal Demonstrations of Understanding of Visible, Imagined, and Tactile Objects in Guided Tours.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52 (1): 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1572857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. 2019. “Classroom Interaction Research: The State of the Art.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52 (3): 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., M. Lynch, and E. Livingston. 1981. “The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (2): 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2003. “Pointing As Situated Practice.” In Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, edited by S. Kita, 217–241. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2011. “Contextures of Action.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, edited by C. Goodwin, J. Streeck, and C. D. LeBaron, 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrettaz, A. M. 2021. “Coda: Materials-In-Interaction As Assemblages, Grammars of Action, and Phenomenological Activity.” Classroom Discourse 12 (1–2): 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1883255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks, W. F. 1990. Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space Among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984. “A Change of State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and G. Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-In-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 2014. “The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View.” New Literary History 45 (1): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. 1972. “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, edited by J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Ingebrand, E., C. Samuelsson, and L. C. Hydén. 2022. “People Living with Dementia Collaborating in a Joint Activity.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 34:100629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 1984. “Transcription conventions.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, ix–xvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, W. 2003. “Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things.” Language & Communication 23 (3–4): 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockelman, P. 2006. “Residence in the World: Affordances, Instruments, Actions, Roles, and Identities.” Semiotica 162 (1–4): 19–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/SEM.2006.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., A. M. Matewos, J. Jaffe, V. Zohery, S. Mohan, K. Bock, and S. Jamani. 2022. “Discourse and Agency During Scaffolded Middle School Science Instruction.” Discourse Processes 59 (5–6): 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2022.2068317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 2016. “The Grammar of Agency: Studying Possibilities for Student Agency in Science Classroom Discourse.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 10:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, Y., and A. M. Dobs. 2017. “Pedagogical Gestures As Interactional Resources for Teaching and Learning Tense and Aspect in the ESL Grammar Classroom.” Language Learning 67 (1): 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza‐Denton, N., S. Eisenhauer, W. Wilson, and C. Flores. 2017. “Gender, Electrodermal Activity, and Videogames: Adding a Psychophysiological Dimension to Sociolinguistic Methods.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 21 (4): 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Denton, N., and S. Jannedy. 2011. “Semiotic Layering Through Gesture and Intonation: A Case Study of Complementary and Supplementary Multimodality in Political Speech.” Journal of English Linguistics 39 (3): 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211405941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messeri, L. 2017. “Resonant Worlds: Cultivating Proximal Encounters in Planetary Science.” American Ethnologist 44 (1): 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2016. Conventions for multimodal transcription. Retrieved from https://franzoesistik.philhist.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/franzoesistik/mondada_multimodal_conventions.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2019. “Contemporary Issues in Conversation Analysis: Embodiment and Materiality, Multimodality and Multisensoriality in Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 145:47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevile, M., P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa. 2014. “On the Interactional Ecology of Objects.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, edited by M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa, 3–26. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B. H. 2015. “‘I Heard it Wasn’t Really a Myth’: Enacting and Contesting Expertise in an Arizona Science Classroom.” Linguistics and Education 31:30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B. H. 2022. “To Walk the Same Road: Convivial Possibilities and Ethical Affordances in Borderlands Schooling.” Anthropologica 64 (2): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica6422022365.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., P. Gonzales, and S. Jacoby. 1996. “When I Come Down I’m in the Domain state”: Grammar and Graphic Representation in the Interpretive Activity of Physicists.” In Interaction and Grammar, edited by E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, and S. Thompson, 328–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. 2015. “The Fact of Uncertainty, the Uncertainty of Facts and the Cultural Resonance of Doubt.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 373 (2055): 20140455. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101.
   Google Scholar
• Rampton, B. 2007. “Neo‐Hymesian Linguistic Ethnography in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (5): 584–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. 1999. “Discourse and Agency in School Science Laboratories.” Discourse Processes 28 (1): 27–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. 2001. “Action and Text: Towards an Integrated Understanding of the Place of Text in Social (Inter)action, Mediated Discourse Analysis and the Problem of Social Action.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 139–184. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. 2012. ““Who Knows best?”: Evidentiality and Epistemic Asymmetry in Conversation.” Pragmatics and Society 3 (2): 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.2.08sid.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. 2011. “The Changing Meanings of Things: Found Objects and Inscriptions in Social Interaction.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, edited by C. Goodwin, J. Streeck, and C. D. LeBaron, 67–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, L., G. Viechnicki, and J. Kuipers. 2011. “Argumentation and the Negotiation of Scientific Authority in Classrooms.” In A Companion to the Anthropology of Education, edited by B. Levinson and M. Pollock, 247–262. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., and Lin. 2019. “Translanguaging and Trans-Semiotising in a CLIL Biology Class in Hong Kong: Whole-Body Sense-Making in the Flow of Knowledge Co-Making.” Classroom Discourse 10 (3–4): 252–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1629322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar