259
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Lesson openings in Norwegian language arts: a study of how teachers start reading lessons in 8th grade classrooms

, &
Received 03 Mar 2023, Accepted 12 Feb 2024, Published online: 14 Mar 2024

References

  • Akther, A. (2014). Role of warm-up activity in language classroom: A tertiary scenario. Thesis. BRAC University. https://api.core.ac.uk/oai/oai:localhost:10361/3553
  • Allern, T. H. (2010). Dramaturgy in teaching and learning. In M. Björkgren, B. Snickars-von Wright, & A. L. Østern (Eds.), Drama in three movements: A Ulyssean encounter (pp. 95–111). Åbo Akademi University.
  • Anmarkrud, Ø, & Brandmo, C. (2021). Engasjerende leseundervisning [Engaging reading instruction]. In V. Grøver & I. Bråten (Eds.), Leseforståelse i skolen. Utfordringer og muligheter [Reading Comprehension in School. Challenges and Opportunities] (pp. 227–240). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
  • Aung, K. S. M., & Tepsuriwong, S. (2017). Lesson openings: How teachers begin lessons in an English class. Online Proceedings of the International Conference: DRAL 3/19th ESEA 2017. Lesson Openings: How Teachers Begin Lessons in an English Class (kmutt.ac.th).
  • Bakke, J. O., & Lindstøl, F. (2021). Chasing fleeing animals – on the dramaturgical method and the dramaturgical analysis of teaching. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 26(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2021.1885370
  • Blikstad-Balas, M. (2017). Key challenges of using video when investigating social practices in education: Contextualization, magnification, and representation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(5), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1181162
  • Boden, K. K., Zepeda, C. D., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2019). Achievement goals and conceptual learning: An examination of teacher talk. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1221–1242. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uio.no/10.1037/edu0000421
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
  • Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w
  • Engelstad, A. (2007). Fra bok til film: om adaptasjon av litterære tekster [From book to movie: On the Adaption of literary texts]. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
  • Gee, J. P. (2007). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. Routhledge.
  • Gjerde, O. A. (2016). Taler og retorikk - håndbok i taleskriving [Speeches and Rhetoric – Handbook in Speech writing]. Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Graf, S. T. (2013). Det eksemplariske princip i didaktikken. En historisk-systematisk undersøgelse af Martin Wagenscheins, Wolfgang Klafkis, Oskar Negts, lærekunstdidaktikkens og Günther Bucks konceptioner af eksemplarisk belæring og læring [The exemplary principle in didactics. A historical systematic study of Martin Wagenscheins, Wolfgang Klafkis, Oskar Negts, didactics of teaching and Günter Bucks conceptions of exemplary teaching and learning]. Thesis. Institut for Kulturvidenskaber, Syddansk Universitet.
  • Graf, S. T. (2021). Et komparativt blik på de frie grundskolers undervisning [A comparative look at instruction in primary schools]. In S. T. Graf & S. S. Mikkelsen (Eds.), Digital projektdidaktik [Digital project didactics]. Århus Universitetsforlag.
  • Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  • Grossman, P. (2015). Protocol for Language Arts Teaching Observations (PLATO 5.0). Stanford University.
  • Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.035
  • Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  • Hodgson, J., Rønning, W., & Tomlinson, P. (2012). Sammenhengen Mellom Undervisning og Læring. En studie av læreres praksis og deres tenkning under Kunnskapsløftet [The connection between teaching and learning. A study of teachers’ practice and their thinking during Kunnskapsløftet]. Nordlandsforskning. https://kudos.dfo.no/documents /11981/files/12106.pdf
  • Hoel, T. L. (1999). “Den første gang, den første gang … ”. Bygging av munnleg klasseromskultur i norskfaget [The first time,, the first time … building an oral classroom culture in Norwegian language arts]. In F. Hertzberg & A. Roe (Eds.), Muntlig norsk [Orality in Norwegian Language arts] (pp. 37–53). Tano Aschehoug.
  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Jensen, F., Pettersen, A., Frønes, T. S., Kjærnsli, M., Rohatgi, A., Eriksen, A., & Narvhus, E. K. (2019). PISA 2018 - Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag [PISA 2018 – Norwegian students’ competence in reading, mathematics and science]. https://www.udir.no/contentassets/2a429fb8627c4615883bf9d884ebf16d/kortrapport-pisa-2018.pdf
  • Klette, K. (2017). Hva vet vi om god undervisning? Rapport fra klasseromsforskningen. [What do we know about good instruction? Report from classroom research]. In I. R. J. Krumsvik & R. Säljö (Eds.), Praktisk pedagogisk utdanning. En antologi [Practic pedagogical education. An anthology] (3rd ed., pp. 173–201). Fagbokforlaget.
  • Klette, K. (2023). Classroom observation as a means of understanding teaching quality: Towards a shared language of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2172360
  • Klette, K., Blikstad-Balas, M., & Roe, A. (2017). Linking instruction and student achievement. A research design for a new generation of classroom studies. Acta Didactica Norge, 11(3), 10. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.4729
  • Klette, K., Roe, A., & Blikstad-Balas, K. (2021). Observational scores as predictors for student achievement gains. In M. Blikstad-Balas, K. Klette, & M. Tengberg (Eds.), Analysing teaching quality: Perspectives, principles and pitfalls (pp. 173–203). Scandinavian Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215045054-2021-06
  • Lahn, L. C., & Klette, K. (2022). Reactivity beyond contamination? An integrative literature review of video studies in educational research. International Journal of Research and Methods in Education, 46(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2094356
  • The Lancet Microbe. (2020). The beginning is the most important part of the work. Lancet Microbe, 1, e308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30204-4
  • Larsen, A. K. (2017). En enklere metode. Veiledning i samfunnsvitenskapelig forskningsmetode [A simpler method. Guidance in social science research method]. Fagbokforlaget.
  • Lindsay, C. (2006). Learning and teaching English: A course for teachers. Oxford University Press.
  • Lindstøl, F. (2017). Fra tekst til episode – en dramaturgisk analyse av lærerens undervisning [From text to episode a dramaturgical analysis of the teacher’s instruction]. In K. Kverndokken, N. Askeland, & H. Siljan (Eds.), Kvalitet og kreativitet i klasserommet – ulike perspektiver på undervisning [Quality and Creativity in the Classroom – Different Perspectives on Instruction] (pp. 145–170). Fagbokforlaget.
  • Magnusson, C. G., Roe, A., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2019). To what extent and how are reading comprehension strategies part of language arts instruction? A study of lower secondary classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.231
  • Markussen, E., & Seland, I. (2013). Den gode timen. En kvalitativ studie av undervisning og læringsarbeid på fire ungdomsskoler i Oslo [The good lesson. A qualitative study of instruction and learning at four secondary schools in Oslo]. Rapport. Utdanningsdirektoratet, NIFU. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/280395
  • Maursethagen, S., & Kostøl, A. (2010). Det relasjonelle aspektet ved lærerrollen [The relational aspect of the teacher role]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 94(3), 231–243. https://www.idunn.no/npt/2010/03/art02
  • McGrath, I., Davies, S., & Mulphin, H. (1992). Lesson beginnings. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 3, 90–108. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED353842.pdf
  • Meichenbaum, D., & Biemiller, A. (1998). Nurturing independent learners: Helping students take charge of their learning. Brookline Books.
  • Mesiti, C., & Clarke, D. (2006). Beginning the lesson: The first ten minutes. In D. Clarke, et al. (Ed.), Making connections (pp. 47–71). Brill.
  • Meyer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (2011). Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd ed.). Routhledge.
  • Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2022). Involver elever og lærlinger i vurderingsarbeidet [Involving students and apprentices in assessments] https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/vurdering/underveisvurdering/involvering/
  • Ødegaard, M., & Arnesen, N. (2010). Hva skjer i naturfagklasserommet? – Resultater fra en videobasert klasseromsstudie; PISA+ [What happends in the science classroom? Results from a videobased classroom study PISA +). Nordic Studies in Science Education, 6(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.271
  • Østern, A. L. (2014). Dramaturgi i didaktisk kontekst [Dramaturgy in a didactic context]. Fagbokforlaget.
  • Parsons, A. W., Parsons, S. A., Malloy, J. A., Gambrell, L. B., Marinak, B. A., Reutzel, D. R., Applegate, M. D., Applegate, A. J., & Fawson, P. C. (2018). Upper elementary students’ motivation to read fiction and nonfiction. The Elementary School Journal, 18(3), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/696022
  • Perrott, E. (1982). Effective teaching. Longman.
  • Rauchenbach, J., & Vanoer, S. (1998). Instant activities: Active learning tasks that start a lesson out right. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(2), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605059
  • Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2019). Interest development and learning. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 265–290). Cambridge University Press.
  • Rinkevich, J. L. (2011). Creative teaching: Why it matters and where to begin. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 291–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2011.575416
  • Roe, A. (2020). Elevenes lesevaner og holdninger til lesing [Students’ reading habits and attitudes towards readning]. In T. S. Frønes & F. Jensen (Eds.), Like muligheter til god leseforståelse? 20 år med lesing i PISA [Equal opportunities for good reading comprehension? 20 years of reading in PISA]. Universitetsforlaget.
  • Roe, A., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2022). Lesedidaktikk - etter den første leseopplæringen [Didactics of reading – after the first reading training]. Universitetsforlaget.
  • Rosenshine, B. V. (1986). Synthesis of research on explicit teaching. Educational Leadership, 43, 60–69.
  • Saloviita, T. (2016). What happens at the lesson start? International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 11(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/22040552.2016.1187651
  • Seidel, T., Rimmele, R., & Prenzel, M. (2005). Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(6), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.004
  • Selling Alexander, J. V., Klette, K., & Nortvedt, G. A. (2023). Teacher enactment of goals in Nordic mathematics classrooms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Silseth, K., Wiig, C., & Erstad, O. (2017). Elevers hverdagserfaringer og kunnskaper som ressurser for læring [Students’ everyday experiences and knowledge as resourses for learning]. In O. Erstad & I. Smette (Eds.), Ungdomsskole og ungdomsliv. Læring i skole, hjem og fritid [Secondary school and youth life. Learning in school, at home and in spare time] (pp. 37–54). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
  • Slot, M. F. (2020). Ved undervisningens begyndelse [At the beginning of instruction]. In S. T. Graf & U. H. Jensen (Eds.), Efterskolens praksis under lup - undersøgelser af dannende undervisning og samvær [Post-school practice under the microscope – studies of formative teaching and socializing] (pp. 79–104). Klim.
  • Svanbjornsdottir, B., Zophoníasdottir, S., & Gísladottir, B. (2022). Quality of the stated purpose and the use of feedback in Icelandic lower-secondary classrooms results from a video study. Teachers and Teaching, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103946
  • Svensen, Å. (1985). Tekstens mønstre: innføring i litterær analyse [The pattern of the text: introcuction to literary analysis]. Universitetsforlaget.
  • Teo, P. (2008). Outside-in/inside-out: Bridging the gap in literacy education in Singapore classrooms. Language and Education, 22(6), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152721
  • Tierney, R. J., & Cunningham, J. W. (1984). Teaching reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of research in reading. Longman.
  • Torvik, A. (1973). Innføring i litterær analyse [Introduction to Literary analysis] (2nd ed.). Universitetsforlaget.
  • Velandia, R. (2008). The role of warming up activities in adolescent students’ involvement during the English class. Profile Journal, 10, 9–26. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1692/169214143002.pdf
  • Weyergang, C., & Magnusson, C. G. (2020). Hva er relevant lesekompetanse i dagens samfunn, og hvordan måles lesing i PISA 2018? [What is relevant reading competence in today’s society, and how is reading measured in PISA 2018?]. In T. S. Frønes & F. Jensen (Eds.), Like muligheter til god leseforståelse? Lesing i PISA i et 20-års perspektiv [Equal opportunities for reading comprehension? Reading in PISA in a 20-year perspective]. Universitetsforlaget.