Recurrent gestures in organic chemistry in tertiary education: creating emblems through material and embodied actions

References

• Bentley, B., K. Walters, and G. C. R. Yates. 2023. “Using Iconic Hand Gestures in Teaching a Year 8 Science Lesson.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 37 (3): 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., and N. Mercer. 1987. Common Knowledge: The Development of Understand in the Classroom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, V. J., F. G. Amar, R. Nemirovsky, B. W. Harrer, M. R. M. Bruce, and M. C. Wittmann. 2015. “Paying Attention to Gesture When Students Talk Chemistry: Interaction Resources for Responsive Teaching.” Journal of Chemical Education 92 (1): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400477b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2007. “Environmentally Coupled Gestures.” In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimensions of Language, edited by S. Duncan, J. Cassell, and E. Levy, 195–212. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotics: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Australia: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second ed. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Jamrozik, A., M. McQuire, E. R. Cardillo, and A. Chatterjee. 2016. “Metaphor: Bridging Embodiment to Abstraction.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23 (4): 1080–1089. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0861-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. 1991. “Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things are Seldom What They Seem.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 7 (2): 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2009. “What is Mode?” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Carey Jewitt, 54–67. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 2005. Gesture & Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D., F. Quek, K. E. McCullough, S. Duncan, N. Furuyama, R. Bryll, X. F. Ma, and R. Ansari. 2001. “Catchments, Prosody and Discourse.” Gesture 1 (1): 9––33. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.1.03mcn.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ping, R., B. Church, M. A. Decatur, S. W. Larson, E. Zinchenko, and S. Goldin-Meadow. 2021. “Unpacking the Gestures of Chemistry Learners: What the Hands Tell Us About Correct and Incorrect Conceptions of Stereochemistry.” Discourse Processes 58 (3): 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1839343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, K.-S., C. Delgado, and E. B. Moje. 2014. “An Integrative Framework for the Analysis of Multiple and Multimodal Representations for Meaning Making in Science Education.” Science Education 98 (2): 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, S. M., and N. S. Newcombe. 2017. ““Embodied Cognition and STEM Learning: Overview of a Topical Collection in CR: PI.” Cognitive Research: Principle and Implication 2 (38): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0071-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, M., and K. S. Tang. 2020. “The Implications of the Non-Linguistic Modes of Meaning for Language Learners in Science: A Review.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (7): 1041–1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1748249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmes, S. E. D., and C. Siry. 2021. “Multimodal Interaction Analysis: A Powerful Tool for Examining Plurilingual Students’ Engagement in Science Practices.” Research in Science Education 51 (1): 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09977-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar