505
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Embodiment and asynchronous storytelling in science classrooms

ORCID Icon

References

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich. 1993. Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Alex Black, Charles R. Lemery, N. Eisenberg Jennifer Mullett, and J. Strayer. 1987. “Motor mimicry as primitive empathy.” In Empathy and Its Development, edited by Nancy Eisenberg and Janet Strayer, 317–338. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Biesta, Gerd. 2004. ““Mind the gap!” Communication and the Educational Relation.” Counterpoints 259:11–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42978490.
  • Bissonnette, Sylvie. 2019. Affect and Embodied Meaning in Animation: Becoming-Animated. New York: Routledge.
  • Bonk, Curtis Jay, and Vanessa Dennen. 1999. “Teaching on the Web: With a Little Help from My Pedagogical Friends.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 11 (1): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940840.
  • Bonk, Curtis Jay, and Elaine Khoo. 2014. Adding Some TEC-VARIETY: 100+ Activities for Motivating and Retaining Learners Online, 1–368. Bloomington, Indiana: Open World Books.
  • Brushwood Rose, C., and Brushwood Rose Chloë. 2009. “The (Im) Possibilities of Self Representation: Exploring the Limits of Storytelling in the Digital Stories of Women and Girls.” Changing English 16 (2): 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13586840902863194.
  • Butler, Judith. 2011. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Carlone Heidi, B. 2012. “Methodological Considerations for Studying Identities in School Science: An Anthropological Approach.” In Identity Construction and Science Education Research, edited by Maria Varelas, 7–25. Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei: Brill.
  • Costello, Eamon, Soverino Tiziana, and Prajakta Girme. 2022. “Books (are not like people): A postdigital fable.” Postdigital Science & Education 4 (2): 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00256-2.
  • Cowie, Bronwen, Judith Moreland, and Kathrin Otrel-Cass. 2013. Expanding Notions of Assessment for Learning: Inside Science and Technology Primary Classrooms. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Cowie, Bronwen, Kathrin Otrel-Cass, Ted Glynn, Helena Kara, Marion Anne Anderson, Jude Doyle, Asri Parkinson, and Christine Te Kiri. 2011. Culturally Responsive Pedagogy and Assessment in Primary Science Classrooms: Whakamana Tamariki. Wellington: Teaching & Learning Research Initiative Nāu i Whatu Te Kākahu, He Tāniko Taku.
  • Crome, Marius, Rahman Alexander, Iversen Robin Michael, and Anne-Katrin Lührs. 2021. “Synchronous Vs. Asynchronous Education: Questionnaire-Based Survey in Dental Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Dtsch Zahnärztl Z International 3 (5): 207–215. https://doi.org/10.3238/dzz-int.2021.0025.
  • Davis James, P., and Alberto Bellocchi. 2018. “Objectivity, Subjectivity, and Emotion in School Science Inquiry.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (10): 1419–1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21461.
  • Du Toit, Jean, and Gregory Morgan Swer. 2021. “Virtual Limitations of the Flesh: Merleau-Ponty and the Phenomenology of Technological Determinism.” Phenomenology and Mind 20 (20): 20–31. https://doi.org/10.17454/pam-2002.
  • Fuchs, T. (2012). The phenomenology of body memory. In Body memory, metaphor and movement [Advances in Consciousness Research], edited by Sabine C. Koch, Thomas Fuchs, Michela Summa and Cornelia Müller, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.84.03fuc.
  • Gee, James Paul. 2004. “Discourse Analysis. What makes it critical?.” In An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, edited by Rebecca Rogers, 19–50. Rogers Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Gibson James, J. 2014. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Classic ed. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Glynn, Ted, Bronwen Cowie, Kathrin Otrel-Cass, and Angus Macfarlane. 2010. “Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: Connecting New Zealand Teachers of Science with Their Māori Students.” Australian Journal of Indigenous Education 39 (1): 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1375/S1326011100000971.
  • Hakkarainen, Päivi. 2011. “Promoting Meaningful Learning Through Video Production- Supported PBL.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 5 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1217.
  • Heath, Christian, Hindmarsh Jon, and Paul Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London: Sage Publications.
  • Hendry, Petra Munro. 2007. “The Future of Narrative.” Qualitative Inquiry 13 (4): 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406297673.
  • Henley, Paul. 2013. “From Documentation to Representation: Recovering the Films of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson.” Visual Anthropology 26 (2): 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2013.751857.
  • Hufendiek, Rebekka. 2015. Embodied Emotions: A Naturalist Approach to a Normative Phenomenon. New York: Routledge.
  • Hufendiek, Rebekka. 2017. “Affordances and the Normativity of Emotions.” Synthese 194 (11): 4455–4476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1144-7.
  • Ihde, Don, and Evan Selinger. 2003. Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Irwin Stacey, O. 2014. “Embodied being: Examining tool use in digital storytelling.” Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry 12 (2): 39–49.
  • Kalthoff, Herbert, and Tobias Röhl. 2011. “Interobjectivity and Interactivity: Material Objects and Discourse in Class.” Human Studies 34 (4): 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9204-y.
  • Kampourakis, Kostas. 2016. “The “General aspects” Conceptualization as a Pragmatic and Effective Means to Introducing Students to Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (5): 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21305.
  • Kohler, Sarah, and Tabea Clara Dietrich. 2021. “Potentials and Limitations of Educational Videos on YouTube for Science Communication.” Frontiers in Communication 6:581302. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.581302.
  • Kuntz Aaron, M., and Ryan Evely Gildersleeve. 2012. “Working Bakhtin’s Body: A Dialogue on Critical Qualitative Research in Education.” International Review of Qualitative Research 5 (1): 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2012.5.1.83.
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • Latour, Bruno. 2004. “How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies.” Body and Society 10 (2–3): 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943.
  • Lewis Patrick, J. 2011. “Storytelling as Research/Research as Storytelling.” Qualitative Inquiry 17 (6): 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411409883.
  • Lockee Barbara, B. 2021. “Online Education in the Post-COVID Era.” Nature Electronics 4 (1): 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0.
  • Manovich, Lev. 2002. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Matusov, Eugene. 2015. “Chronotopes in Education: Conventional and Dialogic.” Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 3:3. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2015.107.
  • McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. The Primacy of Perception. Edited by James M. Edie. Translated by Carleton Dallery. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Neal, Lisa. 2001. “Storytelling at a Distance.” ELearn 2001 (5): 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/566970.566979.
  • Niebert, Kai, Sabine Marsch, and David F. Treagust. 2012. “Understanding Needs Embodiment: A Theory‐Guided Reanalysis of the Role of Metaphors and Analogies in Understanding Science.” Science Education 96 (5): 849–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21026.
  • Otrel-Cass, Kathrin. 2018. “Sensory Science Education.” In Cultural, Social, and Political Perspectives in Science Education, edited by Kathrin Otrel-Cass, Martin Krabbe Sillasen, and Auli Arvola Orlander, 179–195. Cham: Springer.
  • Otrel-Cass, Kathrin. 2022. “Presenting a students’ Tale: The Smartphone Manifesto.” International Journal of Educational Research 114:101999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101999.
  • Otrel-Cass, Kathrin, and Bronwen Cowie. 2019. “The Materiality of Materials and Artefacts Used in Science Classrooms.” In Material Practice and Materiality: Too Long Ignored in Science Education, edited by Catherine Milne and Kathryn Scantlebury, 25–37. Cham: Springer.
  • Pink, Sarah. 2015. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage Publications.
  • Salmon, Gilly. 2011. E-Moderating: The Key to Online Teaching and Learning. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Shapiro, Larry. 2007. “The Embodied Cognition Research Programme.” Philosophy Compass 2 (2): 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00064.x.
  • Shusterman, Richard. 2008. Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sullivan, Paul. 2012. Qualitative Data Analysis Using a Dialogical Approach. Sage Publications: Sage.
  • Tala, Suvi, and Veli-Matti Vesterinen. 2015. “Nature of Science Contextualized: Studying Nature of Science with Scientists.” Science & Education 24 (4): 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9738-2.
  • Towndrow, P. A., and G. Kogut. 2020. Digital Storytelling for Educative Purposes. Singapore: Springer.
  • Truong-White, Hoa, and Lorna McLean. 2015. “Digital storytelling for transformative global citizenship education.” Canadian Journal of Education 38 (2): n2. https://doi.org/10.2307/canajeducrevucan.38.2.11.
  • Uimonen, Heikki. 2010. “The Moving Microphone: Social Media and Acoustic Communication.” Paper presented at Ideologies and Ethics in the Uses and Abuses of Sound, Koli, Finland.
  • Vannini, Phillip, Dennis Waskul, and Simon Gotschalk. 2011. The Senses in Self, Culture, and Society. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Varkey, Thomas Chandy, John A. Varkey, Jack B. Ding, Philip K. Varkey, Colton Zeitler, Anne M. Nguyen, Zachary I. Merhavy, and Charles Ryan Thomas. 2022. “Asynchronous Learning: A General Review of Best Practices for the 21st Century.” Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning 16 (1): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2022-0036.