Material-dialogic space as a framework for understanding material and embodied interaction science education

References

• Avraamidou, Lucy. 2023. Science Is for Everyone: Possible Futures, Possible Selves (Inaugural Lectures). Groningen: University of Groningen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28 (3): 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, CA: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazzul, Jesse, Tolbert Sara, and Kayumova. Shakhnoza. 2019. “New Materialisms and Science Classrooms: Diagramming Ontologies and Critical Assemblies.” In Material Practice and Materiality: Too Long Ignored in Science Education, edited by Catherine Milne and Kathryn Scantlebury, 117–130, Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, Catherine, and Lynn Thomas. 2009. “Understanding Teacher Identity: An Overview of Issues in the Literature and Implications for Teacher Education.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (2): 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, Gert. 2020. “Risking Ourselves in Education: Qualification, Socialization, and Subjectification Revisited.” Educational Theory 70 (1): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, Angela, Hosun Kang, Edna Tan, Tara B. O’Neill, Juanita Bautista-Guerra, and Caitlin Brecklin. 2013. “Crafting a Future in Science: Tracing Middle School Girls’ Identity Work Over Time and Space.” American Educational Research Journal 50 (1): 37–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212458142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, Heidi. 2022. “Understanding and Contextualising the Field of Science Identity.” In Science Identities, edited by Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard and Louise Archer, 3–10, Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Jina, and Park. Joonhyeong. 2023. “Multimodal Representation Patterns and Their Pedagogical Roles in VR/AR Simulations: Focusing on Cases from Digital Science Textbooks in Korea.” In Invited Symposium; Promising Scholars of SIG6 Language and Literacies in Science Education: New Research on Multimodality. European Science Education Research Association, edited by Kok-Sing Tang. Cappadocia, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, K., L. Hetherington, H. Ruck Keene, H. Wren, A. Alexopoulos, O. Ben-Horin, K. Nikolopoulos, J. Robberstad, S. Sotiriou, and F. X. Bogner. 2019. “Dialogue and Materiality/Embodiment in Science|arts Creative Pedagogy: Their Role and Manifestation.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 31:296–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell, Kerry, Sharon Witt, Heather Wren, Leonie Hampton, Pam Woods, Lizzie Swinford, and Martin Hampton. 2023. “Re-Creating Higher Education Pedagogy by Making Materiality and Spatiality Matter.” The Journal of Creative Behavior n/a (n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.619.
   Google Scholar
• Convertini, Josephine, Francesco Arcidiacono, and Céline Miserez-Caperos. 2024. “Teachers’ Interventions in Science Education at Primary School. The Role of Semiotic Resources During Argumentative Interactions in Classroom.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2243835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Natalie R., and Janelle Schaeffer. 2019. “Troubling Troubled Waters in Elementary Science Education: Politics, Ethics & Black Children’s Conceptions of Water [Justice] in the Era of Flint.” Cognition & Instruction 37 (3): 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, Elizabeth, and Matthew X Curinga. 2015. “New Materialist Approaches to the Study of Language and Identity: Assembling the Posthuman Subject.” Curriculum Inquiry 45 (3): 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farland-Smith, Donna. 2017. “The Evolution of the Analysis of the Draw-A-Scientist Test: What Children’s Illustrations of Scientists Tell Us and Why Educators Should Listen.” In Drawing for Science Education, 169–178. Rotterdam: Brill-Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Joseph Paul, Lihua Xu, and Russell Tytler. 2024. “A Pragmatist Semiotic Analysis of Secondary students’ Embodied and Material Reasoning in Astronomy.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2239170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godec, Spela, Uma Patel, Louise Archer, and Emily Dawson. 2020. “Young people’s Tech Identity Performances: Why Materiality Matters.” International Journal of STEM Education 7 (1): 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00249-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1978. Language As Social Semiotic. London: Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Lindsay, Mark Hardman, Jill Noakes, and Rupert Wegerif. 2018. “Making the Case for a Material-Dialogic Approach to Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 54 (2): 141–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1598036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Lindsay, and Rupert Wegerif. 2018. “Developing a Material-Dialogic Approach to Pedagogy to Guide Science Teacher Education.” Journal of Education for Teaching 44 (1): 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1422611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmegaard, Henriette Tolstrup, and Louise Archer. 2022. Science Identities: Theory, method and research Contributions from Science Education Research, 373. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Impedovo, Maria, and Anne-Marie Cederqvist. 2024. “Socio-(Im)material-Making Activities in Minecraft: Retracing Digital Literacy Applied to ESD.” Research in Science & Technological Education 42 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2245355.
   Google Scholar
• Kayumova, Shakhnoza, and Bazzul. Jesse. 2019. “The Ethical and Sociopolitical Potential of New Materialisms for Science Education.” In Material Practice and Materiality: Too Long Ignored in Science Education, edited by Catherine Milne and Kathryn Scantlebury, 51–64. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kersting, Magdalena, Tamer G. Amin, Elias Euler, Bor Gregorcic, Jesper Haglund, Liv Kondrup Hardahl, and Rolf Steier. 2023. “What Is the Role of the Body in Science Education? A Conversation Between Traditions.” Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00434-7.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, Joe L. 2001. “Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 7 (6): 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700601.
   Google Scholar
• Knain, Erik, Tobias Fredlund, and Anniken Furberg. 2021. “Exploring Student Reasoning and Representation Construction in School Science Through the Lenses of Social Semiotics and Interaction Analysis.” Research in Science Education 51:93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09975-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2020. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, Kristiina, and Kajamaa. Anu 2019. “From Material Objects to Social Objects: Researching the Material-Dialogic Spaces of Joint Attention in a School-Based Makerspace.” In A Wide Lens: Combining Embodied, Enactive, Extended, and Embedded Learning in Collaborative Settings, 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), edited by K Lund, G. P. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, and M Baker, 352–359. Lyon, France: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, Lene Moller, and Rie Hjornegaard Malm. 2022. “Doing Geoscience: Negotiations of Science Identity Among University Students When Learning in the Field.” In Science Identities, edited by Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard and Louise Archer, 141–161, Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maine, Fiona. 2015. Dialogic Readers: Children Talking and Thinking Together About Visual Texts. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maine, Fiona, and Anna Čermáková. 2023. “Thinking Aloud: The Role of Epistemic Modality in Reasoning in Primary Education Classrooms.” Language and Education 37 (4): 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2129979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, Rie Hjornegaard, and Katerina Pia Günter. 2023. “A Story of a Hammer - Learning with Materialities in Earth Science Fieldwork.” In European Science Education Research Association. Cappadocia, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, Greg. 2020. “Re-Assembling Environmental and Sustainability Education: Orientations from New Materialism.” Environmental Education Research 26 (9–10): 1353–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1536926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, Catherine, and Kathryn Scantlebury. 2019. Material Practice and Materiality: Too Long Ignored in Science Education. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, Eduardo Fleury, and Renata Reis Pereira. 2024. “Recurrent Gestures in Organic Chemistry in Tertiary Education: Creating Emblems Through Material and Embodied Actions.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2287062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Wendy, and Jennifer Yeo. 2022. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Multimodal Meaning-Making in Science.” Research in Science Education 52 (3): 751–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10051-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Otrel-Cass, Kathrin. 2024. “Embodiment and Asynchronous Storytelling in Science Classrooms.” Research in Science & Technological Education 42.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Amanda, Peta White, and Jo Raphael. 2023. “What Is the ‘Problem’ with STEM Education in an Australian Context? Realisation of Policy Through Arts-Based Research.” In European Science Education Research Association. Cappadocia, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Rahm, Jrène. 2024. ““The Strawberry in the Pot That Became something” – Entanglements of Bodies, Materials, and Affect in Science Activities Supported by a Community Organization.” Research in Science & Technological Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snaza, Nathan, and John Weaver. 2014. Posthumanism and Educational Research. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spyrou, Spyros. 2022. “Relational Ontologies.” In Oxford Bibliographies: Childhood Studies, edited by Heather Montgomery. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199791231/obo-9780199791231-0260.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Sumara, D. J., and B. Davis. 1997. “Enlarging the Space of the Possible: Complexity, Complicity, and Action Research Practices.” In Action Research As Living Practice, edited by T. Carson and D. J. Sumara, 299–312. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Kok-Sing. 2016. “The Interplay of Representations and Patterns of Classroom Discourse in Science Teaching Sequences.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (13): 2069–2095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Kok-Sing. 2022. “Material Inquiry and Transformation As Prerequisite Processes of Scientific Argumentation: Toward a Social-Material Theory of Argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 59 (6): 969–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Kok-Sing. 2024. “Exploring the Materiality of Science Learning: Analytical Frameworks for Examining Interactions with Material Objects in Science Meaning-Making.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2232307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varelas, Maria, Amanda R. Diaz, Rebecca Kotler, Rebecca Woodard, Ronan Rock, Zacahary Sabitt, Nathan Phillips, et al. 2024. “Embodied, Dramatizing Performances in Science Class: Multimodal Spaces and Places of Knowledge and Identity Construction.” Research in Science & Technological Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, Maria F. G., Jesse Bazzul, Marc Higgins, and Sara Tolbert. 2022. Reimagining Science Education in the Anthropocene, edited by Alan Reid and Marcia McKenzie. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, Rupert. 2008. “Dialogic or Dialectic? The Significance of Ontological Assumptions in Research on Educational Dialogue.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (3): 347–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, Rupert. 2011. “Towards a Dialogic Theory of How Children Learn to Think.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 6 (3): 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmes, Sara ED, and Christina Siry. 2021. “Multimodal Interaction Analysis: A Powerful Tool for Examining Plurilingual Students’ Engagement in Science Practices: Proposed Contribution to RISE Special Issue: Analyzing Science Classroom Discourse.” Research in Science Education 51 (1): 71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmes, Sara E. D., and Christina Siry. 2024. “Engaging with Materials and the Body: Young Plurilingual children’s Interactions in Science Investigations.” Research in Science & Technological Education 42.
   Google Scholar