The use of drama in A Level chemistry: a study into the effects of simulation-role-play on the quality of learning of organic reaction mechanisms

References

• Abed, O. 2016. “Drama-Based Science Teaching and Its Effect on pupils’ Understanding of Scientific Concepts and Their Attitudes Towards Science Learning.” International Education Studies 9 (10): 163–173. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n10p163.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., and M. Braund, eds. 2012. Performing Science: Teaching Chemistry, Physics and Biology Through Drama. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Adnan, K., R. Hill, and N. Reid. 2004. “Ideas Underpinning Success in an Introductory Course in Organic Chemistry.” University Chemical Education 8 (2): 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W., and M. J. Nathan. 2012. “Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence from Learners’ and Teachers’ Gestures.” Journal of the Learning Science 21 (2): 247–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arieli, B. 2007. “The Integration of Creative Drama into Science Teaching.” PhD diss., University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P., S. Fogwill, L. Perkovic, and B. Rajender. 1997. “What Happens When Pupils Do Simulation-Role-Play in Science?” Research in Science Education 27 (4): 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461481.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, D., D. McGregor, and A. Bonsall. 2023. “Re-Thinking Theorising About the Use of Drama, Theatre and Performance in Learning science’.” In Learning Science Through Drama. Exploring International Perspectives, edited by D. McGregor and D. Anderson, 11–26. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, G., and G. Bodner. 2005. “It Gets Me to the Product’: How Pupils Propose Organic Mechanisms.” Journal of Chemical Education 82 (9): 1402–1407. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boal, A. 1979. Theatre of the Oppressed. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M. 2015. “Drama and Learning Science: An Empty Space?” British Educational Research Journal 41 (1): 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braund, M., and Z. Ahmed. 2018. “Drama As Physical Role-Play: Actions and Outcomes for Life Science Lessons.” South Africa, Journal of Biological Education 53 (4): 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1490799.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, R. 1989. Play Drama and Thought: The Intellectual Background to Dramatic Education. 4th ed. Toronto: Simon and Pierre Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Craick, F., and M. Watkins. 1973. “The Role of Rehearsal in Short-Term Memory.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12 (6): 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80039-8.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E., A. Hill, J. Barlow, and E. Weitkamp. 2009. “Genetic Testing in a Drama and Discussion Workshop: Exploring Knowledge Construction. Research in Drama Education.” Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 14 (3): 361–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780903072174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorion, K. R. 2009. “Science Through Drama: A Multiple Case Exploration of the Characteristics of Drama Activities Used in Secondary Science Lessons.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (16): 2247–2270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802712699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmiston, B. 2003. “What’s My Position? Role, Frame and Positioning When Using Process Drama.” Research in Drama Education 8 (2): 221–230.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. 1994. “How Are We Going to Teach Organic Chemistry if the Task Force Has Its Way.” Journal of Chemical Education 71 (5): 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., and G. Bodner. 2008. “Making Sense of the Arrow Pushing Formalism Among Chemistry Majors Enrolled in Organic Chemistry.” Chemical Education Research and Practice 9 (2): 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1039/B806225K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., ed. 2007. Visualization in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N., M. Cooper, and E. Cox. 2012. “Does Mechanistic Thinking Improve Pupil Success in Organic Chemistry?” Journal of Chemical Education 89 (7): 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200394d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, N., M. Cooper, and K. Rush. 2012. “‘Decorating with Arrows: Towards the Development of Representational Competence in Organic Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Education 89 (7): 844–849. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed2003934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A., and G. M. O’Donoghue. 2018. “A Model of Learning: Optimising the Effectiveness of Learning Strategies.” In Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists in Their Own Words, edited by K. Illeris. 2nd, 97–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., and D. Waller. 2005. “Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, edited by P. Shah and A. Miyake, 121–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix, R., C. Eick, and D. Shannon. 2012. “The Integration of Creative Drama in an Inquiry-Based Elementary Program: The Effect on Pupil Attitude and Conceptual Learning.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 23 (7): 823–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9292-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hostetter, A. B., and M. W. Alibali. 2008. “Visible Embodiment: Gestures As Simulated Action.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15 (3): 495–514. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaques, D. 2000. Learning in Groups: A Handbook for Improving Group Work. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. 1991. “Why Is Science Difficult to Learn? Things Are Seldom What They Seem.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 7 (2): 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. 2010. “You Can’t Get There from Here.” Journal of Chemical Education 87 (1): 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed800026d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermack, W., and R. Robinson. 1922. “An Explanation of the Property of Induced Polarity of Atoms and an Interpretation of the Theory of Partial Valencies on an Electronic Basis.” Journal of the Chemical Society 121:426–440. https://doi.org/10.1039/CT9222100427.
   Google Scholar
• Marsella, S. C., W. L. Johnson, and C. LaBore 2000. “Interactive Pedagogical Drama.” In: Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 3-7 June 2000Barcelona. 3: 301–308.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, D. 2012. “Dramatising Science Learning: Findings from a Pilot Study to Re-Invigorate Elementary Science Pedagogy for Five- to Seven-Year Olds.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (8): 1145–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.660751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, D., and D. Anderson. 2023. “Epistemic Contrasts of Different Drama Conventions: A Content Analysis of the Range of Affordances Variations of Role Play Offer for Learning Science.” In Learning Science Through Drama, Edited by Exploring International Perspectives, edited by D. McGregor and D. Anderson, 43–67. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, R. J., S. Abbott, P. Bray, J. Exley, and D. Wisnia. 1984. “Teaching Science Through Drama: An Empirical Investigation.” Research in Science and Technological Education 2 (1): 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514840020109.
   Google Scholar
• Ødergaard, M. 2003. “Dramatic Science: A Critical Review of Drama in Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 39 (1): 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260308560196.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, A., and P. Childs 2011. “Second Level Irish Pupils’ and Teachers’ View of Difficulties in Organic Chemistry.” Paper presented at the International Organisation for Science and Technology Education Symposium, Reading, June 20-21.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, N. T., and N. J. Hodges. 2010. “Absence of After-Effects for Observers After Watching a Visuomotor Adaptation.” Experimental Brain Research 205 (3): 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2366-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otter, C. A., 2020. “The Use of Drama in A Level Chemistry: A study into the effects of simulation-role-play on the quality of, and student attitudes towards, learning of organic reaction mechanisms.” PhD diss., University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, B. 2010. “The ‘Good Enough’ Drama: Reinterpreting Constructivist Aesthetics and Epistemology in Drama Education.” Research in Drama Education 15 (4): 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2010.512187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisberg, D. 1997. Cognition. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Salame, I., P. Casiona, and N. Hodges. 2020. “Examining Challenges That Students Face in Learning Organic Chemistry Synthesis.” International Journal of Chemistry Education Research 4 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol4.iss1.art1.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C., R. Harris, and A. Rothe. 2001. “Embodied Cognition Through Improvisation Improves Memory for a Dramatic Monologue.” Discourse Processes 31 (3): 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp31-3_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegle, D. 2019. Educational Research Basics: Experimental Design. University of Connecticut. Accessed November 26, 2022. https://researchbasics.education.uconn.edu/experimental-_research/#.
   Google Scholar
• Stricklanda, A. M., A. Kraft, and G. Bhattacharyya. 2010. “What Happens When Representations Fail to Represent? Graduate Pupils’ Mental Models of Organic Chemistry Diagrams.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 11 (4): 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0RP90009E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. 2013. “Revisiting the Chemistry Triplet: Drawing Upon the Nature of Chemical Knowledge and the Psychology of Learning to Inform Chemistry Education.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14 (2): 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touli, E. H., M. Talbi, and M. Radid. 2012. “‘Teaching-Learning of Chemistry: Analysis of Representations of Learners on the Modelling of Chemical Transformation.” Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences 46:47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.065.
   Google Scholar
• Tregaust, D., G. Chittleborough, and T. Mamiala. 2003. “The Role of Sub-Microscopic and Symbolic Representations in Chemical Explanations.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (11): 1353–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 2017. The Embodied mind, Revised edition: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. London: MIT press.
   Google Scholar