From cookbook lab to PEODE-based lab: redesigning lab activities to foster conceptual understanding

References

• Abdullah, M. N. S., N. A. M. Nayan, and F. M. Hussin. 2017. “A Study on Addressing students’ Misconceptions About Condensation Using the Predict-Discuss-Explain-Observe-Discuss-Explain (PDEODE) Strategy.” In Overcoming students’ Misconceptions in Science, edited by M. Karpudewan, A. Md Zain, and A. Chandrasegaran, 51–69. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3437-4_4.
   Google Scholar
• Accettone, S. L., C. DeFrancesco, C. A. King, and M. K. Lariviere. 2023. “Laboratory Skills Assignments As a Teaching Tool to Develop Undergraduate Chemistry students’ Conceptual Understanding of Practical Laboratory Skills.” Journal of Chemical Education 100 (3): 1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilen, K., S. Köse, and M. Uşak. 2011. “The Effect of Laboratory Activities Designed Based on Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Strategy on Pre-Service Science teachers’ Understanding of Osmosis and Diffusion Subject.” Pamukkale University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences 9 (9): 115–127. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/pausbed/issue/34721/383888.
   Google Scholar
• Bilen, K., M. Özel, and S. Köse. 2016. “Using Action Research Based on the Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy for Teaching Enzymes.” Turkish Journal of Education 5 (2): 72–81. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.70576.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd-Kimball, D., and K. R. Miller. 2018. “From Cookbook to Research: Redesigning an Advanced Biochemistry Laboratory.” Journal of Chemical Education 95 (1): 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., M. J. Kloser, T. Fukami, and R. Shavelson. 2012. “Undergraduate Biology Lab Courses: Comparing the Impact of Traditionally Based ‘Cookbook’ and Authentic Research-Based Courses on Student Lab Experiences.” Journal of College Science Teaching 41 (4): 36–45. https://my.nsta.org/resource/?id=10.2505/4/jcst12_041_04_36.
   Google Scholar
• Candaş, B., and M. Çalik. 2022. “The Effect of CKCM-Oriented Instruction on Grade 8 students’ Conceptual Understanding of Sustainable Development.” Journal of Biological Education 57 (5): 986–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2006748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne, A., L. Klopfer, and J. Anderson. 1980. “Factors Influencing the Learning of Classical Mechanics.” American Journal of Physics 48 (12): 1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çıngıl Bariş, Ç. 2022. “The Effect of the ‘Predict-Observe-Explain (POE)’ Strategy in Teaching Photosynthesis and Respiration Concepts to Pre-Service Science Teachers.” Journal of Biological Education 58 (2): 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2047097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1992. “Statistical Power Analysis.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 1 (3): 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783.
   Google Scholar
• Coştu, F. 2021. Investigation of effectiveness of the predict-explain-observe-discuss-explain based laboratory activities on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, conceptual understanding and science process skills [ Unpublished PhD thesis]. Marmara University.
   Google Scholar
• Coştu, B., and A. Ayas. 2005. “Evaporation in different liquids: Secondary students’ conceptions.” Research in Science & Technological Education 23 (1): 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500068476.
   Google Scholar
• Coştu, B., A. Ayas, M. Çalik, S. Unal, and F. O. Karataş. 2005. “Determining Pre-Service Science teachers’ Competences in Preparing Solutions and in Use of Laboratory Tools.” Hacettepe University Journal Faculty of Education 28 (28): 65–72. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/cilt-sayi-28-yil-2005.html.
   Google Scholar
• Coştu, B., A. Ayas, and M. Niaz. 2010. “Promoting Conceptual Change in students’ Understanding of Evaporation.” Chemistry Education: Research and Practice 11 (3): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1039/C001041N.
   Google Scholar
• Coştu, B., A. Ayas, and M. Niaz. 2012. “Investigating the Effectiveness of a POE-Based Teaching Activity on students’ Understanding of Condensation.” Instructional Science 40 (1): 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9169-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coştu, B., A. Ayas, M. Niaz, S. Unal, and M. Çalik. 2007. “Facilitating Conceptual Change in students’ Understanding of Boiling Concept.” Journal of Science Education & Technology 16:524–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9079-x.
   Google Scholar
• Coştu, F., and H. Bayram. 2021. “The Effectiveness of Predict-Explain-Observe-Discuss-Explain (PEODE) Based Laboratory Works Activities on Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Science Process Skills.” Mimbar Sekolah Dasar 8 (1): 21–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v8i1.30897.
   Google Scholar
• Demircioğlu, H. 2017. “Effect of PDEODE Teaching Strategy on Turkish students’ Conceptual Understanding: Particulate Nature of Matter.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 5 (7): 78–90. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i7.2389.
   Google Scholar
• Domin, D. S. 1999. “A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles.” Journal of Chemical Education 76 (4): 543–547. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavidia, L. M. R., and J. J. M. Galván. 2023. “Predictions and Explanations About Scientific Situations in a High School Context.” International Journal of Science Education 45 (2): 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2153095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund, J., F. Jeppsson, D. Hedberg, and K. J. Schönborn. 2015. “Thermal Cameras in School Laboratory Activities.” Physics Education 50 (4): 424. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/50/4/424.
   Google Scholar
• Hardianti, R. D., and I. U. Permatasari. 2023. “Promoting students’ Science Process Skills Through Predict-Discuss-Explain-Observe-Discuss-Explain Implementation.” Unnes Science Education Journal 12 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15294/USEJ.V12I1.65648.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 2004. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty‐First Century.” Science Education 88 (1): 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, S., C. Tatar, X. Huang, S. H. Sung, and C. Xie. 2022. “Augmented Reality in Science Laboratories: Investigating High School students’ Navigation Patterns and Their Effects on Learning Performance.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 60 (3): 777–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211038764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, S. 2023. “The Use of Dynamic Computer Visualizations Integrated with the POE Sequence: Its Effect on learners’ Understanding, Retention, and Motivation.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 23 (2): 179–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00284-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. 2004. “Classroom Use of Multimedia-Supported Predict–Observe–Explain Tasks in a Social Constructivist Learning Environment.” Research in Science Education 34 (4): 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-8795-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M., D. F. Treagust, S. Yeo, and M. G. Zadnik. 2001. “Students and Teacher Perceptions of the Use of Multimedia Supported Predict-Observe-Explain Task to Probe Understanding.” Research in Science Education 31 (4): 589–615. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013106209449.
   Google Scholar
• Kirbulut, Z. D., and M. E. Beeth. 2013. “Consistency of students’ Ideas Across Evaporation, Condensation, and Boiling.” Research in Science Education 43 (1): 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9264-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretsky, M. D., C. Kelly, and E. Gummer. 2011. “Fundamental Research in Engineering Education. Student Learning in Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories.” Chemical Engineering Education 45 (3): 219–228. https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/122156.
   Google Scholar
• Liew, C. W. 1995. “A Predict-Observe-Explain Teaching Sequence for Learning About students’ Understanding of Heat and Expansion of Liquids.” Australian Science Teachers’ Journal 41 (1): 68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, L., T. Helikar, and J. Dauer. 2022. “Revision as an Essential Step in Modeling to Support Predicting, Observing, and Explaining Cellular Respiration System Dynamics.” International Journal of Science Education 44 (13): 2152–2179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2114815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunetta, V. N., A. Hofstein, and M. Clough. 2007. “Learning and Teaching in the School Science Laboratory: An Analysis of Research, Theory, and Practice.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by N Lederman and S. Abel, 393–441. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marek, E. A. 1986. “They Misunderstand, but they’ll Pass.” The Science Teacher 53 (9): 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaidou, V., P. Nicolaou, and S. A. Nicolaou. 2019. “Transforming a Cookbook Undergraduate Microbiology Laboratory to Inquiry Based Using a Semester-Long PBL Case Study.” Advances in Physiology Education 43 (1): 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00167.2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumus, S., Z. Özdilek, and K. Doymus. 2022. “The Effects of Model-Based Cooperative and Individual Learning Methods on Pre-Service Science teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Gases.” Acta Didactica Napocensia 15 (2): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.15.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. 1995. “The POE in the Primary School: An Evaluation.” Research in Science Education 25 (3): 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357405.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. F., D. F. Treagust, and P. J. Garnett. 1989. “Development and Application of a Diagnostic Instrument to Evaluate Grade-11 and -12 students’ Concepts of Covalent Bonding and Structure Following a Course of Instruction.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26 (4): 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinarbaşi, T., N. Canpolat, S. Bayrakçeken, and O. Geban. 2006. “An Investigation of Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Text-Oriented Instruction on students’ Understanding of Solution Concepts.” Research in Science Education 36:313–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9003-4. 4
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog. 1982. “Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change.” Science Education 66 (2): 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott, J. R., and C. D. Anger. 1970. “Removing the ‘Cook book’ from Freshman Physics Laboratories.” American Journal of Physics 38 (1): 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1976228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, C. P., and D. P. French. 2001. “Factors Affecting Participation in Traditional and Inquiry-Based Laboratories.” Journal of College Science Teaching 31 (4): 225–229.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. W., K. B. Lucas, and C. J. McRobbie. 2003. “The Role of the Microcomputer-Based Laboratory Display in Supporting the Construction of New Understandings in Kinematics.” Research in Science Education 33 (2): 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025073410522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savander-Ranne, C., and S. Kolari. 2003. “Promoting the Conceptual Understanding of Engineering Students Through Visualization.” Global Journal of Engineering Education 7 (2): 189–200.
   Google Scholar
• Sesen, B. A., and L. Tarhan. 2013. “Inquiry-Based Laboratory Activities in Electrochemistry: High School students’ Achievements and Attitudes.” Research in Science Education 43 (1): 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9275-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., and M. B. Wilk. 1965. “An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples).” Biometrika 52 (3/4): 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiland, T. W. 1999. “Constructivism: The Implications for Laboratory Work.” Journal of Chemical Education 76 (1): 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, S. R., M. L. Hilton, and H. A. Schweingruber 2005. America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. National Academy of Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, P., and R. Gunstone. 1999. “The Process of Conceptual Change in Force and Motion During Computer Supported Physics Instruction.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (7): 859–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<859:AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F. 1988. “Development and Use of Diagnostic Tests to Evaluate students’ Misconceptions in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 10 (2): 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaparlis, G., and M. Gorezi. 2005. “A Modification of a Conventional Expository Physical Chemistry Laboratory to Accommodate an Inquiry/project‐Based Component: Method and students’ Evaluation.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 5 (1): 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150509556647.
   Google Scholar
• Ulu, C., and H. Bayram. 2015. “Effects of Laboratory Activities Through the Argumentation Based Inquiry Approach on 7th Grade Students’ Conceptual Learning Electricity in Our Daily Life Unit.” Pamukkale University Journal of Education 37 (37): 61–75. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/pauefd/issue/33862/374978.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. 1988. Learning Science. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. T., and R. F. Gunstone. 1992. Probing Understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. J., and B. J. Fraser. 2008. “Learning Environment, Attitudes and Achievement Among Middle-School Science Students Using Inquiry-Based Laboratory Activities.” Research in Science Education 38 (3): 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar