Troubles-Complaints and the Overall Structural Organization of Troubles-Remedy Sequences

References

• Bloch, S., & Leydon, G. (2019). Conversation analysis and telephone helplines for health and illness: A narrative review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, G. (1987). Moving out of closings. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 101–151). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1988/89). Topic initiation: Business-at-hand. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22(1–4), 61–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818809389298
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2014). Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & P. Drew (Eds.), Requesting in interaction (pp. 55–86). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S. (2006). Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1257–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dersley, I., & Wootton, A. (2000). Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 375–406. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deSouza, D. K., Park, S. H., Wei, W., Zhan, K., Bolden, G. B., Hepburn, A., Mandelbaum, J., Mikeself, L., & Potter, J. (2021). The gratitude opportunity space: The timing of gratitude expressions in object passes. Social Interaction: Video-based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., Heritage, J., Lerner, G., & Pomerantz, A. (2015). Introduction. In P. Drew, J. Heritage, G. Lerner, & A. Pomerantz (Eds.), Talking about troubles in conversation (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35(4), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/800594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., Lindström, A., & Karlsson, S. (2013). Managing troubles-talk in the renegotiation of a loan contract. Discourse Studies, 15(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613483038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B. A., & Heinemann, T. (2021). Are they requests? An exploration of declaratives of trouble in service encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1864154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B., & Heinemann, T. (2016). Rethinking format: An examination of requests. Language in Society, 45, 499–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516000385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T. (2006). ‘Will you or can’t you?’: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1081–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T., & Traverso, V. (2009). Complaining in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2381–2384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., Raymond, C. W., & Drew, P. (2019). Constructing apologies: Reflexive relationships between apologies and offenses. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/800595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1981). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 5(5), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2015). Working the overall structural organisation of a call: How customers use third position as leverage in gaining service representatives’ assistance in dealing with service problems. Language & Communication, 43, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2018). The interactional work of suppressing complaints in customer service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 123, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. (2000). Common ground in cross-cultural communication: Sequential and institutional contexts in front desk service encounters. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.5070/L4111005024
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-H. (2009). Extended requesting: Interaction and collaboration in the production and specification of requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1248–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström, A. (2005). Language as social action. A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation (pp. 209–230). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, A. (2017). Accepting remote proposals. In G. Raymond, G. Lerner, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Enabling human conduct. Studies of talk-in-interaction in honour of Emanuel A. Schegloff (pp. 125–143). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Márquez Reiter, R. (2005). Complaint calls to a caregiver service company: The case of desahogo. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 481–514.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, M. (1976). On questions following questions in service encounters. Language in Society, 5(3), 315–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillet-Shore, D. (2016). Criticizing another’s child: How teachers evaluate students during parent-teacher conferences. Language in Society, 45(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillet-Shore, D. (2015). Complaints, and K. Tracy (Ed.), International encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 186–192). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pino, M. (2016). Delivering criticism through anecdotes in interaction. Discourse Studies, 18(6), 695–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616668069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pino, M. (2022). Hurting and blaming: Two components in the action formation of complaints about absent parties. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 55(3), 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2022.2101298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1978). Attributions of responsibilty: Blamings. Sociology, 12(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200107
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psathas, G. (1992). The study of extended sequences. The case of garden lesson. In G. Watson & R. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context. Contributions to Ethnomethodology (pp. 99–122). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone “So” in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Zimmerman, D. (2007). Rights and responsibilities in calls for help: The case of the mountain glade fire. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(1), 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701331232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Zimmerman, D. (2016). Closing matters: Alignment and misalignment in sequence and call closings in institutional interaction. Discourse Studies, 18(6), 716–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616667141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2003). Asymmetry in action: Sequential resources in the negotiation of a prescription request. Text & Talk, 21(1/2), 19–54.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2013). Overall structural organisation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 257–280). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2012). Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian. Discourse Processes, 49(5), 426–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.684136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2018). Composite social actions: The case of factual declaratives in everyday interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(4), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1524562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2020). Other-repetition in conversation across languages: Bringing prosody into pragmatic typology. Language in Society, 49(4), 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (2005). On complainability. Social Problems, 52(4), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew & A. Wooton (Eds.), Erving Goffman. Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89–135). Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings, and G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23–78). Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (1997). Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(4), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turowetz, J., & Maynard, D. (2010). Morality in the social interactional and discursive world of everyday life. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp. 503–526). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vinkhuyzen, E., & Szymanski, M. H. (2005). Would you like to do it yourself? Service requests and their non-granting responses. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 91–106). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, M., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, M., & Zimmerman, D. (1990). Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in Society, 19(4), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, J., Zimmerman, D., & Whalen, M. (1988). When words fail: A single case analysis. Social Problems, 35(4), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.2307/800591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. (1992a). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 418–469). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. (1984). Talk and its occasion: The case of calling the police. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 210–228). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. (1992b). Achieving context. Openings in emergency calls. In G. Watson & R. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context. Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 35–51). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zinken, J., Rossi, G., Reddy, V. (2020). Doing more than expected. Thanking recognises another’s agency in providing assistance. In C. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilising others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities (pp. 253–278). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar