‘You Don’t Need Me Shouting Here’: When Instructors Observe Learners in Silence

References

• Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 47(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefani, E., & Gazin, A.-D. (2014). Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2018). Changes in turn-design over interactional histories: The case of instructions in driving school lessons. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp. 293–324). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ehmer, O. (2021). Synchronization in demonstrations. Multimodal practices for instructing body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4), 20200038. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0038
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Williamson, V., & Wilkinson, R. (2017). Once more, with feeling: Conductors’ use of assessments and directives to provide feedback in choir rehearsals. Musicae Scientiae, 23(3), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864919844810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J. (2017). The concept of action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, P., & Local, J. (1983). Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90147-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action. Interactions, identities, and institutions. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis (2nd) ed.). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2020). Linguistic structures emerging in the synchronization of a pilates class. In C. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilizing others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities (pp. 147–173). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindwall, O., & Ekström, A. (2012). Instruction-in-interaction: The teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies, 35(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9213-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundesjö Kvart, S. (2020). Instructions in horseback riding - the collaborative achievement of an instructional space. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25, 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundesjö Kvart, S., & Melander Bowden, H. (2022). Instructing equestrian feel: On the art of teaching embodied knowledge. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(2), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1869076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, C. (2017). Ridtränares kommunikation under privatlektioner i dressyr: En samtalsanalytisk studie [The communication of trainers in equestrian dressage: A multimodal interaction analysis]. Scandinavian Sport Studies Forum, 8, 67–86. https://sportstudies.org/2017/09/15/ridtranares-kommunikation-under-privatlektioner-i-dressyr-en-samtalsanalytisk-studie/
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, C. (2020). What do trainers teach their riders about horses and riding? An interaction analysis study of sports dressage training. In J. Bornemark, P. Andersson, & U. E. von Essen (Eds.), Equine cultures in transition (pp. 342–362). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, P., Broth, M., & Haddington, P. (2014). Moving together: Mobile formations in interaction. Editorial to the Special Issue. Space and Culture, 17(2), 104–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2017). Precision timing and timed embeddedness of imperatives in embodied courses of action. In M.-L. Sorjonen, L. Raevaara, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative turns at talk: The design of directives in action (pp. 65–101). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2019). Conventions for multimodal transcriptions. Version 5.0.1. Retrieved August 23, 2023, from https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcriptionLast
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2021). How early can embodied responses be? Issues in time and sequentiality. Discourse Processes, 58(4), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1871561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2021). OKAY in closings and transitions. In E. Betz, A. Deppermann, L. Mondada, & M. L. Sorjonen (Eds.), OKAY across languages: Toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction (pp. 94–127). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nishizaka, A. (2022). The granularity of seeing in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 190, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. (2012). Teaching touch/response-feel. A first step to an analysis of touch from an (inter)active perspective. In S. Norris (Ed.), Multimodality in practice: Investigating theory-in-practice-through-methodology (pp. 7–19). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2020). Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, M. (2018). Imperative actions in boxing sparring sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partington, M., & Cushion, C. (2013). An investigation of the practice activities and coaching behaviors of professional top-level youth soccer coaches. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 23(3), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01383.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partington, M., Cushion, C., & Harvey, S. (2014). An investigation of the effect of athletes’ age on the coaching behaviours of professional top-level youth soccer coaches. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(5), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.835063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauniomaa, M., Haddington, P., Melander, H., Gazin, A.-D., Broth, M., Cromdal, J., Levin, L., & McIlvenny, P. (2018). Parsing tasks for the mobile novice in real time: Orientation to the learner’s actions and to spatial and temproal constraints in instructing-on-the-move. Journal of Pragmatics, 128, 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, D. J., & Szczepek Reed, B. (2013). Building an instructional project: Actions as components of music masterclasses. In B. S. Reed & G. Raymond (Eds.), Units of talk – Units of action (pp. 313–341). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rettig, H. (2020). Praktiken des Empathisierens in Reitunterricht und Pferdeausbildung. In K. Jacob, K.-P. Konerding, & W.-A. Liebert (Eds.), Sprache und Empathie (pp. 285–332). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2012). Overall structural organization. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 257–280). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (2007). Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 483–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., & Uhmann, S. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung, 10, 353–402. http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2009/px-gat2.pdf. Translated and adapted for English by Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). Gesprächsforschung, 12, 1-51. http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2011/px-gat2-englisch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Simone, M., & Galatolo, R. (2020). Climbing as a pair: Instructions and instructed body movements in indoor climbing with visually impaired athletes. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, M., & Galatolo, R. (2021). Timing and prosody of lexical repetition: How repeated instructions assist visually impaired athletes’ navigation in sport climbing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Cushion, C. J. (2006). An investigation of the in-game behaviours of professional, top-level youth soccer coaches. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(4), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500131944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stukenbrock, A. (2014). Take the words out of my mouth: Verbal instructions as embodied practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B. (2017). Creating space for learner autonomy: An interactional perspective. Classroom Discourse, 8(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2017.1328700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B. (2023a). Designing talk for humans and horses: Prosody as a resource for parallel recipient design. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 56(2), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2023.2170638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B. (2023b). ‘Go on keep going’: The instruction of sustained embodied activities. Discourse Studies, 25(5), 692–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231153578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B., Reed, D. J., & Haddon, E. (2013). NOW or NOT NOW: Coordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in musical masterclasses. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolins, J. (2013). Assessment and direction through nonlexical vocalizations in music instruction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vine, B. (2004). Getting things done at work: The discourse of power in workplace interaction. Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, P. (1996). A rehearsal of a Beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 247–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D. W.-L., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2014). Natural gaze signaling in a social context. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar