Quantitative determination of tetracyclines in medicated feed for food-producing animals by HPLC–DAD

References

• Anderson CR, Rupp HS, Wu WH. 2005. Complexities in tetracycline analysis – chemistry, matrix extraction, cleanup, and liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 1075(1–2):23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apley MD, Bush EJ, Morrison RB, Singer RS, Snelson H. 2012. Use estimates of in-feed antimicrobials in swine production in the United States. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 9(3):272–279. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2011.0983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito-Peña E, Urraca JL, Moreno-Bondi MC. 2009. Quantitative determination of penicillin V and amoxicillin in feed samples by pressurised liquid extraction and liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 49(2):289–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.11.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown K, Uwiera RRE, Kalmokoff ML, Brooks SPJ, Inglis GD. 2017. Antimicrobial growth promoter use in livestock: a requirement to understand their modes of action to develop effective alternatives. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 49(1):12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chico J, van Holthoon F, Zuidema T. 2012. Ion suppression study for tetracyclines in feed. Chromatogr Res Int. 2012:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2012/135854.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarchelier A, Anizan S, Minh Tien M, Savoy MC, Bion C. 2018. Determination of five tetracyclines and their epimers by LC–MS/MS based on a liquid–liquid extraction with low temperature partitioning. Food Addit Contam – Part A. 35(4):686–694.
   Google Scholar
• Dewell GA, Rademacher CJ, Sato Y. 2022. Review of regulations and indications for the use of in-feed antimicrobials for production animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 260(S3):S129–S132. doi: 10.2460/javma.22.07.0300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Commission Regulation (EU) No. 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. Off J Eur Union. L15:1–72.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. Regulation (EU) 2017/625 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products. Off J Eur Union. 95(1):1–142.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808 of 22 March 2021 on the performance of analytical methods for residues of pharmacologically active substances used in food-producing animals and on the interpretation of results as well as on the methods to. Off J Eur Union. 180(401):84–109.
   Google Scholar
• [EMA] European Medicine Agency. 2019. Categorisation of antibiotics in the European Union; Answer to the request from the European Commission for updating the scientific advice on the impact on public health and animal health of the use of antibiotics in animals [accessed 2023 Dec 20]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/categorisation-antibiotics-european-union-answer-request-european-commission-updating-scientific-advice-impact-public-health-and-animal-health-use-antibiotics-animals_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council. 2019. Regulation (EU) 2019/4 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of medicated feed, amending Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing. Off J Eur Union. 4(178):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fiori J, Grassigli G, Filippi P, Gotti R, Cavrini V. 2005. HPLC-–DAD and LC–ESI–MS analysis of doxycycline and related impurities in doxipan mix, a medicated premix for incorporation in medicated feedstuff. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 37(5):979–985. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.06.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavilán R, Nebot C, Miranda J, Martín-Gómez Y, Vázquez-Belda B, Franco C, Cepeda A. 2015. Analysis of tetracyclines in medicated feed for food animal production by HPLC–MS/MS. Antibiotics. 5(1):1. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics5010001.
   Google Scholar
• Georgaki D, Vandael F, Cardoso de Carvalho Ferreira H, Filippitzi ME, De Backer P, Devreese M, Dewulf J, Croubels S. 2023. Qualitative risk assessment of homogeneity, stability, and residual concentrations of antimicrobials in medicated feed and drinking water in pig rearing. BMC Vet Res. 19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03555-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimpețeanu OM, Pogurschi EN, Popa DC, Dragomir N, Drăgotoiu T, Mihai OD, Petcu CD. 2022. Antibiotic use in livestock and residues in food—a public health treat: a review. Foods. 11(10):1430. doi: 10.3390/foods11101430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granados-Chinchilla F, Rodríguez C. 2017. Tetracyclines in food and feedingstuffs: from regulation to analytical methods, bacterial resistance, and environmental and health implications. J Anal Methods Chem. 2017:1315497. doi: 10.1155/2017/1315497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jank L, Martins MT, Arsand JB, Ferrão MF, Hoff RB, Barreto F, Pizzolato TM. 2018. An LC–ESI–MS/MS method for residues of fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides, tetracyclines and trimethoprim in feedingstuffs: validation and surveillance. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 35(10):1975–1989. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2018.1508895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn LH. 2017. Antimicrobial resistance: a one health perspective. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 111(6):255–260. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trx050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez-Ordóñez A, Bolton D, Bover-Cid S, Chemaly M, Davies R, De Cesare A, Herman L, Hilbert F. 2021. Maximum levels of cross-contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non-target feed. Part 12: tetracyclines: tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, and doxycycline. EFSA J. 19(10) e06852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdi Y, Létourneau-Montminy MP, Gaucher ML, Chorfi Y, Suresh G, Rouissi T, Brar SK, Côté C, Ramirez AA, Godbout S. 2018. Use of antibiotics in broiler production: global impacts and alternatives. Anim Nutr. 4(2):170–178. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministero della Salute. 2017-2024. Elenco dei Medicinali veterinari autorizzati alla commercializzazione o in stato di sospensione. [List of authorized and suspended veterinary medicines]. Italian. [accessed 2023 Dec 20]. https://www.dati.salute.gov.it/dati/dettaglioDataset.jsp?menu=dati&idPag=90.
   Google Scholar
• Ministero della Salute. 2021. Piano nazionale di controllo ufficiale sull’alimentazione animale. [National plan for official controls on animal feed]. Italian. [accessed 2024 Mar 26]. https://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2997_allegato.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Patyra E, Kowalczyk E, Kwiatek K. 2013. Development and validation method for the determination of selected tetracyclines in animal medicated feedingstuffs with the use of micellar liquid chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem. 405(21):6799–6806. doi: 10.1007/s00216-013-7117-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patyra E, Kwiatek K. 2017. Development and validation of multi-residue analysis for tetracycline antibiotics in feed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 34(9):1553–1561. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2017.1364430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patyra E, Kwiatek K. 2019. HPLC–DAD analysis of florfenicol and thiamphenicol in medicated feedingstuffs. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 36(8):1184–1190. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2019.1619943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patyra E, Kwiatek K. 2021. Comparison of HPLC–DAD and LC–MS techniques for the determination of tetracyclines in medicated feeds using one extraction protocol. Chromatographia. 84(8):741–749. doi: 10.1007/s10337-021-04058-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Rodríguez M, Pellerano RG, Pezza L, Pezza HR. 2018. An overview of the main foodstuff sample preparation technologies for tetracycline residue determination. Talanta. 182(January):1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.01.058.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santos-Santórum Suárez C, Sanders P, Gaugain M, Viel A, Paboeuf F, Taillandier JF, Houée P, Valentin C, Perrin-Guyomard A. 2023. Selection of antibiotic resistance in pigs after exposure to feed cross-contaminated with oxytetracycline. Vet Microbiol. 287(June):109924. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2023.109924.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stolker AAM, Manti V, Zuidema T, van Egmond H, Deckers ER, Herbes R, Hooglugt J, Olde Heuvel E, de Jong J. 2013. Carry-over of veterinary drugs from medicated to non-medicated feeds in commercial feed manufacturing plants. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 30(6):1100–1107. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2013.794308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandael F, Filippitzi ME, Dewulf J, Daeseleire E, Eeckhout M, Devreese M, Croubels S. 2019. Oral group medication in pig production: characterising medicated feed and drinking water systems. Vet Rec. 185(13):405–405. doi: 10.1136/vr.105495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Yang H, Zhang C, Mo Y, Lu X. 2008. Determination of oxytetracycline, tetracycline and chloramphenicol antibiotics in animal feeds using subcritical water extraction and high performance liquid chromatography. Anal Chim Acta. 619(1):54–58. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.01.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar