References
- Açikgül, K. (2020). The effect of technological pedagogical content knowledge game activities supported micro-teaching practices on preservice mathematics teachers’ self-efficacy perception levels. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.13.2.11
- Antle, A. N. (2008). Child-based personas: Need, ability and experience. Cognition, Technology & Work, 10(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0071-2
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (1st ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Clark-Wilson, A., & Hoyles, C. (2019). A research-informed web-based professional development toolkit to support technology-enhanced mathematics teaching at scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9836-1
- Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
- Doğan, M. (2012). Prospective Turkish primary teachers’ views about the use of computers in mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9214-3
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
- Gurevich, I., Stein, H., & Gorev, D. (2017). Tracking professional development of novice teachers when integrating technology in teaching mathematics. Computers in the Schools, 34(4), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1387470
- Guy, B. R. (2017). Movers, shakers, & everyone in between: Faculty personas surrounding active learning in the undergraduate STEM classroom. Inquiry in Education, 9(2), 6.
- Jang, S.-J., & Tsai, M.-F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003
- Jonsen, K., & Jehn, K. A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 4(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391
- Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative text analysis: A systematic approach. In Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education (pp. 181–197). Springer.
- Lavicza, Z., Weinhandl, R., Prodromou, T., Anđić, B., Lieban, D., Hohenwarter, M., Fenyvesi, K., Brownell, C., & Diego-Mantecón, J. M. (2022). Developing and evaluating educational innovations for STEAM education in rapidly changing digital technology environments. Sustainability, 14(12), 7237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127237
- Lilley, M., Pyper, A., & Attwood, S. (2012). Understanding the student experience through the use of personas. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 11(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2012.11010004
- Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. 12., überarb. Aufl. Beltz.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
- Minichiello, A., Hood, J. R., & Harkness, D. S. (2018). Bringing user experience design to bear on STEM education: A narrative literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1(1–2), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0005-3
- Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
- Odell, B., Cutumisu, M., & Gierl, M. (2020). A scoping review of the relationship between students’ ICT and performance in mathematics and science in the PISA data. Social Psychology of Education, 23(6), 1449–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09591-x
- Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPACK framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00447.x
- Patahuddin, S. M., Lowrie, T., & Dalgarno, B. (2016). Analysing mathematics teachers’ TPACK through observation of practice. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5–-6), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0305-2
- Statistik Austria. (2023). Bildung in Zahlen 2021/22. Retrieved November 28, 2023, from https://www.statistik.at/fileadmin/user_upload/BiZ-2021-22_Tabellenband.pdf.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. SAGE.
- Sundt, A., & Davis, E. (2017). User personas as a shared lens for library UX. Weave: Journal of Library User Experience, 1(6), 601. https://doi.org/10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.601
- van Rooij, S. W. (2012). Research-based personas: Teaching empathy in professional education. Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(3), 77–86.
- Vorvoreanu, M., Madhavan, K., Kitkhachonkunlaphat, K., & Zhao, L. (2016). Designing for STEM faculty: The use of personas for evaluating and improving design. In International Conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management, 369–380.
- Voskoglou, M. G. (2019). Communities of practice for teaching and learning mathematics. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(6), 186–191.
- Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Preservice teachers’ TPACK development: A review of literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1498039
- Weinhandl, R., Houghton, T., Lindenbauer, E., Mayerhofer, M., Lavicza, Z., & Hohenwarter, M. (2021). Integrating technologies into teaching and learning mathematics at the beginning of secondary education in Austria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2057. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11428
- Weinhandl, R., & Lavicza, Z. (2019). Exploring essential aspects when technology-enhanced flipped classroom approaches are at the heart of professional mathematics teacher development courses. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 26(3), 139–143.
- Weinhandl, R., Mayerhofer, M., Houghton, T., Lavicza, Z., Eichmair, M., & Hohenwarter, M. (2022). Personas characterising secondary school mathematics students: Development and applications to educational technology. Education Sciences, 12(7), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070447
- Weinhandl, R., Mayerhofer, M., Houghton, T., Lavicza, Z., Eichmair, M., & Hohenwarter, M. (2023). Mathematics student personas for the design of technology-enhanced learning environments. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 32.
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard business press.
- Yeh, Y. F., Chan, K. K. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2021). Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computers & Education, 171, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238