A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Cyberbullying Prevention Programs’ Impact on Cyber-Bystander Behavior

REFERENCES

• *Pieschl, S., Kourteva, P., & Stauf, L. (2017). Challenges in the evaluation of cyberbullying prevention – Insights from two case studies. International Journal of Developmental Science, 11(1-2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-160209
   Google Scholar
• Allison, K. R., & Bussey, K. (2016). Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses’ responses to cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, K. R., & Bussey, K. (2017). Individual and collective moral influences on intervention in cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall; p. 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. Handbook of Personality, 2, 154–196.
   Google Scholar
• Barhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., & Hyde, C. T. (2013). Children’s physiological and emotional reactions to witnessing bullying predict bystander intervention. Child Development, 84(1), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01839.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlett, C. P., Prot, S., Anderson, C. A., & Gentile, D. A. (2017). An empirical examination of the strength differential hypothesis in cyberbullying behavior. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2015). The role of short- and long-term cognitive empathy activation in preventing cyberbystander reinforcing cyberbullying behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(4), 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2018). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of affective versus cognitive empathy in increasing prosocial cyberbystander behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, S. (2014). Cyberbullying: What counselors need to know. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, R. (2014). Student and teacher responses to violence in school: The divergent views of bullies, victims, and bully-victims. School Psychology International, 35(5), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313511012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, N., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2016). Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1044256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., Spears, B., Slee, P., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2012). Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimisation. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.704316
   Google Scholar
• *Carter, J. L. (2012). The effects of a cyberbully prevention program on middle school students’ online behaviors and self-esteem [Doctoral dissertation].
   Google Scholar
• Chassiakos, Y. L. R., Radesky, J., Christakis, D., Moreno, M. A., & Cross, C. (2016). Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138(5), e2–e18. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleemput, K. V., Vandebosch, H., & Pabian, S. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034300211002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. L. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90006-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Cardon, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Deboutte, G., Herrewijn, L., Malliet, S., Pabian, S., Van Broeckhoven, F., De Troyer, O., Deglorie, G., Van Hoecke, S., Samyn, K., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2018). The efficacy of the Friendly Attac serious digital game to promote prosocial bystander behavior in cyberbullying among young adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSmet, A., Deforche, B., Hublet, A., Tanghe, A., Stremersch, E., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Traditional and cyberbullying victimization as correlates of psychosocial distress and barriers to a healthy lifestyle among severely obese adolescents-a matched case-control study on prevalence and results from a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 224. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Domínguez-Hernández, F., Bonell, L., & Martínez-González, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of factors that moderate bystanders’ actions in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-1
   Google Scholar
• Dymnicki, A., Trivits, L., Hoffman, C., & Osher, D. (2020). Advancing the Use of Core Components of Effective Programs: Suggestions for Researchers Publishing Evaluation Results. Retrieved from https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/263931/ASPE-Brief-Core-Components.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Z., & Tipton, E. (2015). robumeta: An R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. ArXiv:1503.02220 [Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02220
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gini, G., & Espelage, D. L. (2014). Peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide risk in children and adolescents. JAMA, 312(5), 545–546. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hymel, S. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, L. D., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10(4), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986006002107
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazerooni, F., Taylor, S. H., Bazarova, N. N., & Whitlock, J. (2018). Cyberbullying bystander intervention: The number of offenders and retweeting predict likelihood of helping a cyberbullying victim. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(3), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, C., & Weber, M. (2018). Do I really need to help?!” Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders’ willingness to help the victim. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4) https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-4
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 53(1 Suppl), S13–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kozubal, M., Szuster, A., & Barlińska, J. (2019). Cyberbystanders, affective empathy and social norms. Studia Psychologica, 61(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.21909/sp.2019.02.777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambe, L. J., Cioppa, V. D., Hong, I. K., & Craig, W. M. (2019). Standing up to bullying: A social ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens, smartphones & texting. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/Reports/2012/Teens-and-smartphones.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2009). Identifying interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J., C., (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. (pp. 147–158). Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, T.-L., Meter, D. J., Chen, W.-T., & Lee, Y. (2019). Defending behavior of peer victimization in school and cyber context during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of individual and peer-relational characteristics. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 891–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macháčková, H., & Pfetsch, J. (2016). Bystanders’ responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macháčková, H., Dedkova, L., & Mezulanikova, K. (2015). Brief report: The bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macháčková, H., Dedkova, L., Sevcikova, A., & Cerna, A. (2013). Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. J., Ybarra, M., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). The relative importance of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency, and substance use. Child Maltreatment, 12(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559507305996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. D., Chua, J. Y. X., & Shorey, S. (2020). The effectiveness of educational interventions on traditional bullying and cyberbullying among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1–20. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020933867
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, A. B., & Mele-Taylor, D. (2014). Empathetic responsiveness, group norms, and prosocial affiliations in bullying roles. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 29(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, A. B., Aloe, A. M., & Werth, J. M. (2015). The relation of empathy and defending in bullying: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-15-0035.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermaier, M., Fawzi, N., & Koch, T. (2016). Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1491–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814563519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olenik-Shemesh, D., Heiman, T., & Eden, S. (2017). Bystanders’ Behavior in Cyberbullying Episodes: Active and Passive Patterns in the Context of Personal-Socio-Emotional Factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515585531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, L. J., Allan, A., & Cross, D. (2016). Adolescent bystanders’ perspectives of aggression in the online versus school environments. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, J. S. (2017). Empathic skills and cyberbullying: relationship of different measures of empathy to cyberbullying in comparison to offline bullying among young adults. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 178(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2016.1256155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., Grotpeter, J., Ingram, K. M., Michaelson, L., Spinney, E., Valido, A., El Sheikh, A., Torgal, C., & Robinson, L. (in press). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Prevention Science.
   Google Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., Pigott, T. D., Espelage, D. L., & Grotpeter, J. K. (2019). Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(3), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2020). Behavior during cyberbullying episodes: Initial validation of a new self-report scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runions, K. C., & Bak, M. (2015). Online moral disengagement, cyberbullying, and cyber aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C. (2014). Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in intervention? Theory into Practice, 53(4), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheithauer, H., Smith, P. K., & Samara, M. (2016). Cultural issues in bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents: Methodological approaches for comparative research. International Journal of Developmental Science, 10(1-2), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-16000085
   Google Scholar
• Shultz, E., Heilman, R., & Hart, K. J. (2014). Cyber-bullying: An exploration of bystander behavior and motivation. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-4-3
   Google Scholar
• Tanner-Smith, E. E., Tipton, E., & Polanin, J. R. (2016). Handling complex meta-analytic data structures using robust variance estimates: A tutorial in R. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 2(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-016-0026-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. H., DiFranzo, D., Choi, Y. H., Sannon, S., & Bazarova, N. N. (2019). Accountability and empathy by design: encouraging bystander intervention to cyberbullying on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–26. (CSCW), https://doi.org/10.1145/3359220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tipton, E. (2015). Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, Bastiaensens, S., Poels, K., DeSmet, A., & De, B. (2014). A systematic review of studies evaluating anti-cyberbullying programs. NL.
   Google Scholar
• Van Geel, M., Vedder, P., & Tanilon, J. (2014). Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(5), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 56(5), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. C., Small, K., Brodley, C. E., Lau, J., Trikalinos, T. A. (2012, January). Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center: Abstrackr. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium (pp. 819–824). https://doi.org/10.1145/2110363.2110464
   Google Scholar
• Wegge, D., Vandebosch, H., & Eggermont, S. (2014). Who bullies whom online: A social network analysis of cyberbullying in a school context? Communications, 39(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0019
   Google Scholar
• You, L., & Lee, Y.-H. (2019). The bystander effect in cyberbullying on social network sites: Anonymity, group size, and intervention intentions. Telematics and Informatics, 45, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar