256
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
The Engaged Scientist

Best Practices for STEM-Focused Mobile Instructional Spaces

, &
Pages 82-92 | Received 05 Dec 2023, Accepted 30 Jan 2024, Published online: 08 Apr 2024

References

  • Bhabha, H. 1994. The Location of Culture. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bybee, R. W. 2010. “Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 70 (1): 30–35.
  • Fox, J. 2015. “Changes in Urban Youths’ Attitude towards Science and Perception of a Mobile Science Lab Experience.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Columbia University.
  • Heydari, R. 2020. “The Impacts of Informal Science Education on Students’ Science Identity and Understanding of Science Inquiry.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Columbia University.
  • Martin, L. 2015. “The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 5 (1): 30–39.
  • Moore, T. J., and K. A. Smith. 2014. “Advancing the State of the Art of STEM Integration.” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 15 (1): 5–10.
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2014. STEM Integration in K–12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington: National Academies Press.
  • Papert, S. 1991. “Situating Constructionism.” In Constructionism, edited by S. Papert and I. Harel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Perot Museum of Nature and Science. 2023. “Community engagement: TECH Truck.” September 7. https://www.perotmuseum.org/events/children-and-families/tech-truck/
  • Roehrig, G. H., E. A. Dare, J. A. Ellis, and E. Ring-Whalen. 2021. “Beyond the Basics: A Detailed Conceptual Framework of Integrated STEM.” Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 3 (1): 1–18.
  • Soja, E. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.