References
- Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041
- Aukerman, M., & Chambers Schuldt, L. (2021). What matters most? Toward a robust and socially just science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S85–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.406
- Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2013). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. In M. R. Hawkins (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies (pp. 105–135). Routledge.
- Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury.
- Gee, J. P. (2014). Literacy and education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739571
- Janks, H. (2013). The importance of critical literacy. In J. Pandya & J. Ávila (Eds.), Moving critical literacies forward (pp. 32–44). Routledge.
- Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
- Muhammad, G. (2023). Unearthing joy: A guide to culturally and historically responsive curriculum and instruction. Scholastic.
- Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
- Shanahan, T. (2020). What constitutes a science of reading instruction? Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S235–S247. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.349
- Shulman, L. S. (2000). Teacher development: Roles of domain expertise and pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00057-X