References

  • Ajayi, L. (2009). English as a second language learners’ exploration of multimodal texts in a junior high school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(7), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.7.4
  • Angay-Crowder, T., Choi, J., & Yi, Y. (2013). Putting multiliteracies into practice: Digital storytelling for multilingual adolescents in a summer program. TESL Canada Journal, 30(2), 36–36. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v30i2.1140
  • Behrman, E. H. (2006). Teaching about language, power, and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(6), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.6.4
  • Bishop, P. A., & Harrison, L. M. (2021). The successful middle school: This we believe. Association for Middle Level Education.
  • Castañeda, M., Shen, X., & Claros-Berlioz, E. (2018). English learners (ELs) have stories to tell: Digital storytelling as a venue to bring justice to life. The English Journal, 107(6), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201829706
  • Chuang, H. H., Hsieh, M. H., Cheng, Y. Y., & Wang, C. C. (2019). An instrument for assessing the development of scientific imagination via digital storytelling for elementary school students. Creativity Research Journal, 31(4), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1670025
  • Creswell, J. & Clark, P. L. V. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
  • De la Piedra, M. T. (2010). Adolescent worlds and literacy practices on the United States‐Mexico border. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.7.5
  • Downes, J. M., & Bishop, P. (2012). Educators engage digital natives and learn from their experiences with technology: Integrating technology engages students in their learning. Middle School Journal, 43(5), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2012.11461824
  • Dreon, O., Kerper, R. M., & Landis, J. (2011). Digital storytelling: A tool for teaching and learning in the YouTube generation. Middle School Journal, 42(5), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461777
  • Fu, J. S., Yang, S. H., & Yeh, H. C. (2022). Exploring the impacts of digital storytelling on English as a foreign language learners’ speaking competence. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(5), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1911008
  • García, O., & Kleifgen, J. A. (2020). Translanguaging and literacies. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.286
  • Hall, L. A. (2016). The role of identity in reading comprehension development. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.861332
  • Hansen-Thomas, H., Stewart, M. A., Flint, P., & Dollar, T. (2021). Co-learning in the high school English class through translanguaging: Emergent bilingual newcomers and monolingual teachers. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 20(30), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1726759
  • Hirsch, S., & Macleroy, V. (2020). The art of belonging: Exploring the effects on the English classroom when poetry meets multilingual digital storytelling. English in Education, 54(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1690394
  • Honeyford, M. A. (2013). The simultaneity of experience: Cultural identity, magical realism and the artefactual in digital storytelling. Literacy, 47(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00675.x
  • Howell, E. (2018). Expanding argument instruction: Incorporating multimodality and digital tools. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 61(5), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.716
  • Howell, E., Butler, T., & Reinking, D. (2017). Integrating multimodal arguments into high school writing instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(2), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X17700456
  • Howell, E., & Dyches, J. (2022). Sharpening students’ racial literacies through multimodal subversion. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 66(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1255
  • Howell, E., Perez, S., & Abraham, W. T. (2021). Toward a professional development model for writing as a digital, participatory process. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.294
  • Johnson, L., & Kendrick, M. (2017). “Impossible is nothing”: Expressing difficult knowledge through digital storytelling. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(6), 667–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.624
  • Karam, F. J. (2018). Language and identity construction: The case of a refugee digital bricoleur. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(5), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.719
  • Kazazoglu, S., & Bilir, S. (2021). Digital storytelling in L2 writing: The effectiveness of “storybird web 2.0 tool”. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(2), 44–50.
  • Kendrick, M., Early, M., Michalovich, A., & Mangat, M. (2022). Digital storytelling with youth from refugee backgrounds: Possibilities for language and digital literacy learning. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 961–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3146
  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
  • Lahey, T., & Rizopoulos, L. (2023). Learning from alumni: Creating middle school classrooms that support English language learners. Middle School Journal, 54(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2022.2142005
  • Lankshear C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Researching new literacies: Web 2.0 practices and insider perspectives. E-Learning & Digital Media, 4(3), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2007.4.3.224
  • Lau, S. M. C. (2013). A study of critical literacy work with beginning English language learners: An integrated approach. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2013.753841
  • Li, G. (2017). From absence to affordances: Integrating old and new literacies in school‐based instruction for English learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(3), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.662
  • Linares, R. E. (2019). Meaningful writing opportunities: Write-alouds and dialogue journaling with newcomer and English learner high schoolers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(5), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.932
  • Liu, K. P., Tai, S. J. D., & Liu, C. C. (2018). Enhancing language learning through creation: The effect of digital storytelling on student learning motivation and performance in a school English course. Educational Technology Research & Development, 66(4), 913–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9592-z
  • Liu, M. C., Huang, Y. M., & Xu, Y. H. (2018). Effects of individual versus group work on learner autonomy and emotion in digital storytelling. Educational Technology Research & Development, 66(4), 1009–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9601-2
  • Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 448–461.
  • Maunakea, S. P., Simanu, C., & Suluai-Mahuka, S. (2022). Culturally sustaining web 2.0 technology use in the Pacific: Innovations from American Samoa and Hawaiʻi. Middle School Journal, 53(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2021.1999747
  • McDaniel, C. (2004). Critical literacy: A questioning stance and the possibility for change. The Reading Teacher, 57(5), 472–481.
  • McLaughlin, M., & DeVoogd, G. (2004). Critical literacy as comprehension: Expanding reader response. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.48.1.5
  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
  • Okumus, A. (2020). The perceptions and preferences of 8th grade students in digital storytelling in English. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(2), 585–604.
  • Pirbhai-Illich, F., Turner, K., & Austin, T. (2009). Using digital technologies to address aboriginal adolescents’ education: An alternative school intervention. Multicultural Education and Technology Journal, 3(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/17504970910967573
  • Robin, B. R. (2016). The power of digital storytelling to support teaching and learning. Digital Education Review, (30), 17–29.
  • Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
  • Siefert, B., Kelly, K., Yearta, L., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Teacher perceptions and use of technology across content areas with linguistically diverse middle school students. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1568327
  • Smith, B. E., Pacheco, M. B., & Khorosheva, M. (2021). Emergent bilingual students and digital multimodal composition: A systematic review of research in secondary classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.298
  • Vasquez, V. M., Janks, H., & Comber, B. (2019). Critical literacy as a way of being and doing. Language Arts, 96(5), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201930093
  • WIDA Consortium. (2014). WIDA focus on technology in the classroom. https://wida.wisc.edu/sites/default/files/resource/FocusOn-Technology-in-the-Classroom.pdf
  • WIDA Consortium. (2020). WIDA English language development standards framework. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. https://wida.wisc.edu/sites/default/files/resource/WIDA-ELD-Standards-Framework-2020.pdf
  • Wilder, P., & Msseemmaa, D. (2019). Centering disciplinary literacies on student consciousness: A Tanzanian case study. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(5), 479–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.880
  • Wu, J., & Chen, D. T. V. (2020). A systematic review of educational digital storytelling. Computers & Education, 147, 103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103786
  • Yang, Y. T. C., Chen, Y. C., & Hung, H. T. (2022). Digital storytelling as an interdisciplinary project to improve students’ English speaking and creative thinking. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 840–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1750431

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.